Prepared Food Photos Inc. v. Wing Madness Inc.
| Prepared Food Photos Inc. and Adlife Marketing & Communications Co., Inc |
| Wing Madness Inc. |
| 3:2023cv00647 |
| May 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert N Chatigny |
| Robert A Richardson |
| Copyright |
| 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set Deadlines: Dismissal due by 8/11/2023. (Rickevicius, L.) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Settlement by Prepared Food Photos Inc. (Muller, Chip) |
Filing 13
ORDER denying without prejudice #12 Motion for Extension of Time to answer for failure to comply with Local Rule 7. Any renewal of this motion must be filed by 7/13/2023 and must comply with the Local Rule which has been copied below for ease of access. Local Rule 7(b) Motions for Extensions of Time 1. All motions for extensions of time must be decided by a Judge and will not be granted except for good cause. The good cause standard requires a particularized showing that the time limitation in question cannot reasonably be met despite the diligence of the party seeking the extension. 2. All motions for extensions of time shall include a statement of the movant that (1) the movant has inquired of all non-moving parties and there is agreement or objection to the motion, or that (2) despite diligent effort, including making the inquiry in sufficient time to afford non-movant a reasonable opportunity to respond, the movant cannot ascertain the position(s) of the non-movant(s). All such motions shall also indicate the number of motions for extension of time that have previously been filed by the movant with respect to the same time limitation. The Court may rule on the motion, without notice, before expiration of the period ordinarily permitted for filing opposition papers, notwithstanding a report of objection. Any party may move within seven (7) days of an order granting a motion for extension of time to have the Court set aside the order for good cause. Agreement of the parties as to any extension of time does not by itself extend any time limitation or provide good cause for failing to comply with a deadline established by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, these rules, or the Court. 3. All motions for extension of time shall be filed at least three (3) business days before the deadline sought to be extended, except in cases in which compelling circumstances warranting an extension arise during the three days before the deadline. Any motion for extension of time filed fewer than three business days before the deadline sought to be extended shall, in addition to satisfying all other requirements of this Rule, set forth reasons why the motion was not filed at least three business days before the deadline in question. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 6/29/2023. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer filed by Wing Madness Inc.. (Samson, Jessalyn) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Prepared Food Photos Inc.. (Muller, Chip) |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Prepared Food Photos Inc.. Wing Madness Inc. served on 6/7/2023, answer due 6/28/2023. (Muller, Chip) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Wing Madness Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Chip Muller* *Muller Law, LLC* *47 Wood Avenue* *Barrington, RI 02806*. (Samson, Jessalyn) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #6 Electronic Filing Order, #2 Disclosure Statement filed by Prepared Food Photos Inc., #4 Report on Copyright Form, #5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Prepared Food Photos Inc., 3 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #7 Protective Order Signed by Clerk on 5/19/2023.(Samson, Jessalyn) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 5/18/2023.(Samson, Jessalyn)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 5/18/2023.(Samson, Jessalyn)
|
|
Filing 5
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 7/17/2023. Discovery due by 11/17/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 12/22/2023. Signed by Clerk on 5/18/2023.(Samson, Jessalyn)
|
| Filing 4 AO 121 Report on the filing of an Action re: Copyright Form Completed. (Muller, Chip) |
| Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 5/18/2023.(Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by Prepared Food Photos Inc.. (Muller, Chip) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Wing Madness Inc. ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7351855.), filed by Prepared Food Photos Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit, #2 Exhibit, #3 Supplement Civil Cover Sheet)(Muller, Chip) |
| Judge Robert N. Chatigny and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Freberg, B) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Wing Madness Inc.. (Muller, Chip) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
