Robinson v. Discover
| Wesley B. Robinson |
| Discover and Experian |
| 3:2023cv00724 |
| June 2, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarala V Nagala |
| Robert M Spector |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 30
ORDER granting #26 Motion for Attorney McKenna to Appear Pro Hac Vice; granting #27 Motion for Attorney Malone-Zietz to Appear Pro Hac Vice. Certificates of Good Standing due by 9/24/2023. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 7/26/2023. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
| Filing 29 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Discover.(Natale, Anthony) |
| Filing 28 ANSWER to #1 Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Experian.(Rubin, Ann) |
| Filing 27 MOTION for Attorney(s) Stefanie Malone-Zietz to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice by Discover. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit of Stefanie Malone-Zietz)(Natale, Anthony) |
| Filing 26 MOTION for Attorney(s) Daniel J.T. McKenna to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice by Discover. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit of Daniel J.T. McKenna)(Natale, Anthony) |
| Filing 25 Disclosure Statement by Experian. (Rubin, Ann) |
|
Filing 24
ORDER denying without prejudice #22 Motion for Attorney Daniel J.T. McKenna to be admitted pro hac vice; denying without prejudice #23 Motion for Attorney Stefanie Malone-Zietz to be admitted pro hac vice. Local Rule 83.1(d)(1)(b) requires a visiting attorney to identify the bar identification number of the bar of each court of which the attorney is a member, or state that no such number has been assigned. Although Attorneys McKenna and Malone-Zietz represent that they are members of the bars of various courts, see ECF No. [22-1] para. 4; ECF No. [23-1] para. 4, the motions do not identify the bar numbers assigned by those courts or otherwise indicate that no bar numbers have been assigned. The motions may be refiled in compliance with the Local Rules. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 7/13/2023. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
| Filing 23 MOTION for Attorney(s) Stefanie Malone-Zietz to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7410026) by Discover. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit of Stefanie Malone-Zietz)(Natale, Anthony) |
| Filing 22 MOTION for Attorney(s) Daniel J.T. McKenna to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7410004) by Discover. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit of Daniel J.T. McKenna)(Natale, Anthony) |
| Answer deadline updated for Discover to 7/21/2023; Experian to 7/21/2023. (Samson, Jessalyn) |
|
Filing 21
ORDER granting #16 Motion for Extension of Time; granting #19 Motion for Extension of Time. Both Defendants shall respond to the complaint by July 21, 2023. Counsel are reminded, however, that, pursuant to D. Conn. L. R. 7(b): "All motions for extension of time shall be filed at least three (3) business days before the deadline sought to be extended, except in cases in which compelling circumstances warranting an extension arise during the three days before the deadline. Any motion for extension of time filed fewer than three business days before the deadline sought to be extended shall, in addition to satisfying all other requirements of this Rule, set forth reasons why the motion was not filed at least three business days before the deadline in question." Future failures to comply with Local Rule 7(b)(3) may result in the denial of non-compliant motions for extension of time without prejudice to the refiling of a compliant motion. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 6/29/2023. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
| Filing 20 NOTICE of Appearance by Angela M Vickery-Davis on behalf of Discover (Vickery-Davis, Angela) |
| Filing 19 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until July 21, 2023 to Answer, Move, or Otherwise Respond to #1 Complaint by Discover. (Natale, Anthony) |
| Filing 18 Disclosure Statement by Discover identifying Corporate Parent Discover Financial Services for Discover. (Natale, Anthony) |
| Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Anthony J. Natale on behalf of Discover (Natale, Anthony) |
| Filing 16 MOTION for Extension of Time until 7/20/2023 File Responsive Pleading by Experian. (Rubin, Ann) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Ann H. Rubin on behalf of Experian (Rubin, Ann) |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS Returned Executed Experian served on 6/8/2023, answer due 6/29/2023. (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed Discover served on 6/13/2023, answer due 7/4/2023. (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Discover, Experian* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Wesley B. Robinson* *119 Smith St.* *Bridgeport, CT 06607*. (Oliver, T.) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Discover, Experian. (Oliver, T.) |
|
Filing 12
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. SELF-REPRESENTED FILERS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE JUDGE'S STANDARD ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER WHICH IS ATTACHED. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 6/7/2023.(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER. Plaintiff's complaint, ECF No. 1, lists only Defendant Discover in the case caption, but identifies Experian as another Defendant in the section identifying the parties. The Court construes this as attempting to name Experian as a Defendant in addition to Discover. The Clerk is directed to add Experian as a Defendant in this case. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 21. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 6/7/2023. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER granting #3 Plaintiff's Motion to participate in electronic filing. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 6/7/2023. (Rennie, Carolyn)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 4 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #6 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by Wesley B. Robinson, #7 Protective Order. Signed by Clerk on 6/6/2023. (Mendez, D) |
|
Filing 7
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 6/2/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 6/2/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 5
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 8/1/2023. Discovery due by 12/2/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 1/6/2024. Signed by Clerk on 6/2/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
| Filing 4 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 6/2/2023. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 3 MOTION by Self-Represented Litigant to Participate in Electronic Filing by Wesley B. Robinson. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 2 Consent to Electronic Notice by Wesley B. Robinson (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Discover, filed by Wesley B. Robinson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing fee received from Wesley B. Robinson: $402.00, receipt number BPT-13723. (Oliver, T.) |
| Judge Sarala V. Nagala and Judge Robert M. Spector added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
