Guo v. Manning
Petitioner: Mei Guo
Respondent: Julie A. Manning
Case Number: 3:2023cv00795
Filed: June 20, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Kari A Dooley
Referring Judge: Janet C Hall
2 Judge: Robert A Richardson
Nature of Suit: Other Statutes: Administrative Procedures Act/Review or Appeal of Agency Decision
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 3, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER directing Petitioner to provide the Court with a courtesy copy of the #1 Complaint and its related attachments, consistent with the Court's order regarding courtesy copy requirements. See ECF No. #4 . Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 8/3/2023. (Chambers, Jillian)
June 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER OF TRANSFER. Case reassigned to Judge Kari A. Dooley for all further proceedings. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 6/23/2023.(Sichanh, Christina)
June 23, 2023 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by Aaron Romney on behalf of Mei Guo (Romney, Aaron)
June 21, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE of Related Case by Mei Guo (Moriarty, James)
June 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 STANDING DISCOVERY ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 6/20/2023.(Freberg, B)
June 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 6/20/2023.(Freberg, B)
June 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 6/20/2023.(Freberg, B)
June 20, 2023 Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 6/20/2023.(Anastasio, F.)
June 20, 2023 Filing 1 COMPLAINT Mei Guo's Petition for Writ of Mandamus against Julie A. Manning ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7387352.), filed by Mei Guo. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Exhibit M, #14 Exhibit N, #15 Exhibit O, #16 Exhibit P, #17 Exhibit Q, #18 Exhibit R, #19 Exhibit S, #20 Exhibit T, #21 Exhibit U, #22 Exhibit V, #23 Exhibit W, #24 Exhibit X, #25 Exhibit Y, #26 Exhibit Z, #27 Exhibit AA, #28 Exhibit BB)(Moriarty, James)
June 20, 2023 Judge Janet C. Hall and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Oliver, T.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Guo v. Manning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Mei Guo
Represented By: James M. Moriarty
Represented By: Aaron Romney
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Julie A. Manning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?