Hertz v. Melissa & Doug, LLC
Gary Hertz |
Melissa & Doug, LLC |
3:2023cv00804 |
June 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Maria E Garcia |
Omar A Williams |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
29 U.S.C. ยง 623 Job Discrimination (Age) |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses by Melissa & Doug, LLC.(Cannavino, Deborah) |
Set Deadline: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 8/27/2023; Answer deadline updated for Melissa & Doug, LLC to 8/16/2023. (Velez, F.) |
![]() |
Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time until August 16, 2023 to File Responsive Pleading #1 Complaint by Melissa & Doug, LLC. (Cannavino, Deborah) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Deborah DeHart Cannavino on behalf of Melissa & Doug, LLC (Cannavino, Deborah) |
Filing 11 Disclosure Statement by Melissa & Doug, LLC. (Cannavino, Deborah) |
![]() |
Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Gary Hertz. Melissa & Doug, LLC served on 6/26/2023, answer due 7/17/2023. (Lucas, Scott) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Melissa & Doug, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Scott R. Lucas* *Lucas & Varga LLC* *2425 Post Road, Suite 200* *Southport, CT 06890*. (Pesta, J.) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #5 Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by Gary Hertz, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #6 Notice, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 6/23/23.(Pesta, J.) |
Filing 6 NOTICE Re: Initial Discovery Protocols Signed by Clerk on 6/21/23. (Attachments: #1 attachment)(Pesta, J.) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 6/21/23.(Hushin, Z.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Melissa & Doug, LLC ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7389424.), filed by Gary Hertz.(Lucas, Scott) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Melissa & Doug, LLC. (Lucas, Scott) |
Judge Omar A. Williams and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hertz v. Melissa & Doug, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Gary Hertz | |
Represented By: | Scott R. Lucas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Melissa & Doug, LLC | |
Represented By: | Deborah DeHart Cannavino |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.