Yang v. United States Citizenship and Immigration Services et al
Wen Yang |
United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, Alejandro Mayorkas and Ur Jaddou |
3:2023cv00810 |
June 21, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Michael P Shea |
Robert M Spector |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 MOTION for Attorney Theodore N. Cox to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice by Wen Yang. Certificate of Good Standing due by 9/10/2023. Signed by Clerk on 7/12/2023. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Attorney(s) Theodore N. Cox to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice by Wen Yang. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Llinas, James) Modified on 7/12/2023 (Peterson, M) to include receipt number (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7401555 - from ECF #8 ). |
Filing 9 ORDER: The Motion for Pro Hac Vice (ECF No. #8 ) is DENIED for failure to conform to Local Rule 83.1(d)'s requirement that visiting attorneys identify each bar of court of which said attorney is and has ever been a member, and provide the corresponding bar identification number(s), or if no such number(s) has been assigned, to state so. The motion can be re-filed in accordance with the Local Rule.Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 7/10/2023. (Housman, L) |
Filing 8 MOTION for Attorney(s) Theodore N. Cox to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7401555) by Wen Yang. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit)(Llinas, James) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Ur Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *James Christopher Llinas* *Llinas Law, LLC* *553 Portland-Cobalt Road, Unit 2* *Portland, CT 06480-1968*. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #1 Complaint filed by Wen Yang, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #5 Protective Order. Signed by Clerk on 6/27/2023. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 6/22/2023. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 6/22/2023. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 8/21/2023. Discovery due by 12/22/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 1/26/2024. Signed by Clerk on 6/22/2023. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 6/22/2023.(Perez, J.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7390968.), filed by Wen Yang, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Llinas, James) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Llinas, James) |
Judge Michael P. Shea and Judge Robert M. Spector added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.