Martin v. BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. et al
Katelyn Martin |
BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc., Vimal Mehta and Richard Steinhart |
3:2023cv00915 |
July 7, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Sarala V Nagala |
Robert A Richardson |
Securities/Commodities |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re #10 MOTION for Attorney(s) Charles H. Linehan to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7414040) by Katelyn Martin. (Nolan, Erica) |
Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Richard Steinhart waiver sent on 7/13/2023, answer due 9/11/2023 filed by Katelyn Martin. (Nolan, Erica) |
Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Vimal Mehta waiver sent on 7/13/2023, answer due 9/11/2023 filed by Katelyn Martin. (Nolan, Erica) |
Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc. waiver sent on 7/13/2023, answer due 9/11/2023 filed by Katelyn Martin. (Nolan, Erica) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting #10 Motion for Attorney Charles H. Linehan to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice. Certificate of Good Standing due by 9/15/2023. Signed by Clerk on 7/17/2023. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Attorney(s) Charles H. Linehan to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7414040) by Katelyn Martin. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Declaration)(Slossberg, David) |
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *BioXcel Therapeutics, Inc., Vimal Mehta, Richard Steinhart* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *David A. Slossberg* *Hurwitz Sagarin Slossberg & Knuff, LLC* *147 N. Broad Street* *Milford, CT 06460*. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #6 Electronic Filing Order, #5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #7 Protective Order, 3 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #1 Complaint filed by Katelyn Martin, #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Katelyn Martin. Signed by Clerk on 7/11/2023. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 4 Disclosure Statement by Katelyn Martin. (Nolan, Erica) |
Filing 7 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 7/7/2023. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 7/7/2023. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 9/5/2023. Discovery due by 1/6/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 2/10/2024. Signed by Clerk on 7/7/2023. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 7/7/2023.(Anastasio, F.) |
Judge Sarala V. Nagala and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Freberg, B) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Erica Oates Nolan on behalf of Katelyn Martin (Nolan, Erica) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7406733.), filed by Katelyn Martin. (Attachments: #1 Sworn Certification of Plaintiff, #2 Civil Cover Sheet)(Slossberg, David) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Slossberg, David) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.