Quantum-Si Incorporated v. Bhuiya
Quantum-Si Incorporated |
Mohammad Wadud Bhuiya |
3:2023cv00928 |
July 12, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Disclosure Statement (Corporate) by Quantum-Si Incorporated. (Mastrony, Maura) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT (Verified) against Mohammad Wadud Bhuiya ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7411979.), filed by Quantum-Si Incorporated.(Mastrony, Maura) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Quantum-Si Incorporated v. Bhuiya | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Quantum-Si Incorporated | |
Represented By: | Maura Mastrony |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Mohammad Wadud Bhuiya | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.