Dahlinghaus v. Dahlinghaus
| Angela Dahlinghaus |
| Andrew Dahlinghaus |
| 3:2023cv00953 |
| July 19, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert N Chatigny |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Other Fraud |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 Case remanded to State Court Judicial District of Fairfield at Bridgeport. (Samson, Jessalyn) |
| JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Samson, Jessalyn) |
Filing 23
ORDER granting #16 Consent Motion to Remand to State Court. See ECF No. 22 for details. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 8/29/2023. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
|
Filing 22
Approved. So ORDERED re #21 Joint Stipulation filed by Andrew Dahlinghaus. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 8/29/2023. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Filing 21 Proposed STIPULATION re #16 MOTION to Remand to State Court Resolving Motion to Remand by Both Parties by Andrew Dahlinghaus. (Kornafel, Joanna) |
|
Filing 20
ORDER granting #18 Motion for Extension of Time to file a response to Plaintiff's amended complaint until 30 days after an order on the Motion to Remand. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 8/11/2023. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting in part and denying in part #17 Motion for Prefiling Conference. The prefiling conference requirement is hereby waived. Defendant may file his Motion to Dismiss without a prefiling conference. So ordered. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 8/11/2023. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Filing 18 Second MOTION for Extension of Time on Consent to File Responsive Pleading by Andrew Dahlinghaus. (Kornafel, Joanna) |
| Filing 17 MOTION for Pre-Filing Conference (Renewed) by Andrew Dahlinghaus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Affidavit Certifying Good Faith Efforts to Resolve Issues Concerning Proposed Motion to Dismiss)(Kornafel, Joanna) |
| Filing 16 MOTION to Remand to State Court by Angela Dahlinghaus.Responses due by 8/30/2023 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Laske, Arthur) |
| Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by Arthur C. Laske, III on behalf of Angela Dahlinghaus (Laske, Arthur) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER denying without prejudice #13 Motion for Prefiling Conference for failure to comply fully with the prefiling conference request requirement. Specifically, no request for a prefiling conference may be submitted unless the attorney making the request has conferred with other counsel of record and discussed the proposed motion in a good faith effort to clarify the issues, eliminate or reduce the area of controversy and arrive at a mutually satisfactory resolution. Cf. D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 37(2)(requiring counsel to confer before filing motions relating to discovery disputes). Any request for a prefiling conference must include a statement that the attorney submitting the request has conferred with other counsel and must briefly describe the results of the conference. So ordered. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 8/3/2023. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Filing 13 MOTION for Pre-Filing Conference by Andrew Dahlinghaus. (Kornafel, Joanna) |
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Extension of Time #11 to 8/25/2023 to File a Responsive Pleading. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 7/21/2023. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Filing 11 MOTION for Extension of Time until August 25, 2023 to File Responsive Pleading by Andrew Dahlinghaus. (Baranowsky, Kellianne) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #6 Notice (Other) filed by Andrew Dahlinghaus, #7 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Response filed by Andrew Dahlinghaus, #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Andrew Dahlinghaus, #9 Protective Order, #4 Notice of Appearance filed by Andrew Dahlinghaus, 3 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Andrew Dahlinghaus, #8 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 7/19/2023. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removed Cases)(Samson, Jessalyn) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 7/19/2023.(Samson, Jessalyn)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 7/19/2023.(Samson, Jessalyn)
|
|
Filing 7
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 9/17/2023. Discovery due by 1/18/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 2/22/2024. Signed by Clerk on 7/19/2023.(Samson, Jessalyn)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Andrew Dahlinghaus of Pending Motion in State Court (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Kornafel, Joanna) |
| Filing 5 RESPONSE re 3 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, filed by Andrew Dahlinghaus. (Kornafel, Joanna) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by Kellianne Baranowsky on behalf of Andrew Dahlinghaus (Baranowsky, Kellianne) |
| Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 7/19/2023.(Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by Joanna M. Kornafel on behalf of Andrew Dahlinghaus (Kornafel, Joanna) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Andrew Dahlinghaus from Connecticut Superior Court, Judicial District of Fairfield at Bridgeport, case number FBT-CV23-6125219-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-7418667, filed by Andrew Dahlinghaus. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Civil Action Coversheet)(Kornafel, Joanna) |
| Judge Robert N. Chatigny and Judge S. Dave Vatti added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Dahlinghaus v. Dahlinghaus | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Angela Dahlinghaus | |
| Represented By: | Thomas G. Ganim |
| Represented By: | Arthur C. Laske, III |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Andrew Dahlinghaus | |
| Represented By: | Joanna M. Kornafel |
| Represented By: | Kellianne Baranowsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
