Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Reddy
| Deutsche Bank National Trust Company |
| Walter Reddy, III |
| 3:2023cv00979 |
| July 24, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarala V Nagala |
| Robert M Spector |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 First MOTION to Remand to State Court by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company.Responses due by 10/4/2023 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibits A & B)(Staskiewicz, Benjamin) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO THE BAR OF THE US DISTRICT COURT OF CONNECTICUT Re: Local Rule 83.1 Admission of Attorneys. The above captioned case has been received and filed in our court. Please see our Local Rule 83.1 regarding Admission of Attorneys that is available on our website at www.ctd.uscourts.gov. You will not be added to the case, nor will we accept further filings until you have complied with Local Rule 83.1. If you have any questions about this procedure, please contact the Clerk's Office. Signed by Clerk on 9/7/2023.(Bozek, M.) |
| Set Deadline: Show Cause Response due by 8/30/2023. (Bozek, M.) |
Filing 11
ORDER granting Motion for Extension of Time. Defendant's deadline to show cause as to why the case should not be remanded is now August 30, 2023. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 8/14/2023. (Parfenoff, Ivan)
|
| Filing 10 MOTION/Request for Enlargement of Time by Walter Reddy, III. (Shafer, J.) |
|
Filing 9
ORDER. Defendant was ordered to serve the Court's order at ECF No. 8 on Plaintiff by July 31, 2023, and file a notice of service on the docket by August 2, 2023. To date, no notice of service has been filed. Defendant shall file the notice by August 11, 2023. By that date, Defendant must also file a nunc pro tunc motion to extend the deadline for filing, explaining why Defendant failed to comply with the Court's deadline. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 8/7/2023. (Parfenoff, Ivan)
|
| Set Deadline: Show Cause Response due by 8/16/2023. (Bozek, M.) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The Court has received and reviewed the notice of removal in this action. No later than August 16, 2023 Defendant shall show cause why this case should not be remanded to state court for failure to timely remove this action. It is further ORDERED that Defendant shall serve this order on Plaintiff no later than July 31, 2023 and shall file a notice of service on the docket no later than August 2, 2023. Plaintiff may file any opposition to Defendant's response to this order to show cause no later than August 30, 2023. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 7/26/23. (Marks, Joshua)
|
| Filing 7 STANDING ORDER ON REMOVED CASES. Signed by Clerk on 7/24/2023. (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Notice of Removal filed by Walter Reddy, III, #5 Protective Order. Signed by Clerk on 7/24/2023. (Mendez, D) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 7/24/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 7/24/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 9/22/2023. Discovery due by 1/23/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 2/27/2024. Signed by Clerk on 7/24/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 7/24/2023. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Walter Reddy, III from Superior Court of the State of Connecticut for the Judicial District of Stamford/Norwalk Housing Session, case number NWH-CV-18-6004197-S, NWH-CV-18-6004196-5, filed by Walter Reddy, III. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing fee received from Walter Reddy III: $402.00, receipt number BPT-13794. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Judge Sarala V. Nagala and Judge Robert M. Spector added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Reddy | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Deutsche Bank National Trust Company | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin T. Staskiewicz |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Walter Reddy, III | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
