D & T Auto Salvage, Inc. et al v. Guerrera
| D & T Auto Salvage, Inc. and James Aurilio |
| Antonio Guerrera |
| 3:2023cv01002 |
| July 27, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Maria E Garcia |
| Sarala V Nagala |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 18
ORDER granting #17 Defendant's motion for extension of time. No further extensions will be granted for these deadlines absent extraordinary circumstances. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 9/22/2023(Piccolo, Marissa)
|
| Filing 17 Second MOTION for Extension of Time until 11/7/2023 Respond to Complaint by Antonio Guerrera. (Malick, Vianca) |
| Answer deadline updated for Antonio Guerrera to 10/8/2023. (Bozek, M.) |
|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #14 motion for extension of time. Defendant shall file a responsive pleading by October 8, 2023. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 9/1/2023. (Piccolo, Marissa)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER granting #12 motion for extension of time nunc pro tunc. Plaintiff's disclosure statement filed at ECF No. 11 is accepted as if timely filed. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 8/31/2023. (Piccolo, Marissa)
|
| Filing 14 First MOTION for Extension of Time until 10/8/2023 Respond to Complaint #1 Complaint by Antonio Guerrera. (Malick, Vianca) |
| Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by D & T Auto Salvage, Inc., James Aurilio. Antonio Guerrera served on 8/18/2023, answer due 9/8/2023. (Angelone, Daniel) |
| Filing 12 MOTION for Extension of Time until 8/30/2023 Rule 7.1 Disclosure Filing #11 Disclosure Statement by D & T Auto Salvage, Inc.. (Angelone, Daniel) |
| Filing 11 Disclosure Statement by D & T Auto Salvage, Inc.. (Angelone, Daniel) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER. As discussed in the Court's notice at ECF No. 2, and order at ECF No. 8, a disclosure statement must be filed with a non-governmental corporate party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1. The Court ordered that Plaintiff D&T Auto Salvage, Inc. file a disclosure statement by August 18, 2023, but no disclosure statement has been filed to date. It is hereby ordered that no later than September 1, 2023, Plaintiff D&T Auto Salvage, Inc. shall file a disclosure in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and District of Connecticut Standing Order 22-36. In addition to filing the disclosure, Plaintiff must also contemporaneously file a motion requesting an extension of time nunc pro tunc explaining why Plaintiff has now twice ignored the Court's orders to file a disclosure statement. Plaintiff is also warned that any future failure to comply with the Court's orders may result in sanctions against counsel, Plaintiff, or both. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 8/29/2023.(Piccolo, Marissa)
|
| Set Deadline: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 10/11/2023. (Bozek, M.) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Vianca T. Malick on behalf of Antonio Guerrera (Malick, Vianca) |
|
Filing 8
ORDER. As discussed in the Court's notice at ECF No. 2, a disclosure statement must be filed with a partys first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1. As no such filing has been made to date, it is hereby ORDERED that no later than August 18, 2023, Plaintiff D&T Auto Salvage, Inc. shall file a disclosure in compliance with Federal and Local Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1 and District of Connecticut Standing Order 22-36. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 8/9/2023.(Piccolo, Marissa)
|
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Antonio Guerrera* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Daniel T. Angelone* *Angelone Law Offices, LLC* *799 Silver Lane, 3rd Floor* *Trumbull, CT 06611*. (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #5 Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by James Aurilio, D & T Auto Salvage, Inc. Signed by Clerk on 7/28/2023. (Mendez, D) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 7/27/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 7/27/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 9/25/2023. Discovery due by 1/26/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 3/1/2024. Signed by Clerk on 7/27/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 7/27/23.(Hushin, Z.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7429445.), filed by D & T Auto Salvage, Inc., James Aurilio.(Angelone, Daniel) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Angelone, Daniel) |
| Judge Sarala V. Nagala and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
