Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Koch
| Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Trustee for WAMU Pass Through Certificates, Series 2005-AR11 and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company |
| Paul R. Koch |
| 3:2023cv01022 |
| July 31, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Jeffrey A Meyer |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 24
ORDER. The Court DENIES the motions for extension of time (Docs. #22 , #23 ) for failure to show good cause and because it appears that the defendant is improperly seeking to delay the adjudication of the plaintiff's motion to remand. Because the defendant has failed to comply with scheduling deadline despite being the party who has sought relief in this Court in the first instance by way of removal of this action, the Court will enter a ruling in due course on the motion to remand on the basis of papers filed to date. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 9/20/2023. (Lewis, D)
|
| Filing 23 AMENDED MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response as to #9 First MOTION to Remand to State Court until 20 days to Tuesday October 10, 2023 by Paul R. Koch. (Chartier, A) |
| Filing 22 MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Response as to #9 First MOTION to Remand to State Court until 20 days to Tuesday October 10, 2023 by Paul R. Koch. (Chartier, A) |
| Filing 21 Appearance Self Represented Party by Paul R. Koch (Chartier, A) |
| Filing 20 Amended RESPONSE by Deutsche Bank National Trust Companyto Extension of Time #13 &16. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A through Exhibit D)(Staskiewicz, Benjamin) |
| Filing 19 Set/Reset Deadlines as to #9 First MOTION to Remand to State Court . Responses due by 9/19/2023 (Lewis, D) |
|
Filing 18
ORDER. The Court DENIES the motion for extension of time (Doc. #13 ) for failure to show good cause for an extension. See D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 7(a). Defendant shall file any objection or other response to the motion to remand on or before September 19, 2023. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 9/8/2023. (Lewis, D)
|
|
Filing 17
ORDER. The Court DENIES defendant's motion for writ (Doc. #12 ) on the ground that defendant has not shown good cause or authority for a federal court to enter an order of disclosure from a state court. Nor has defendant shown an adequate need for such an order of disclosure. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 9/8/2023. (Lewis, D)
|
| Filing 16 First OBJECTION to Extension of Time (Doc. #13) filed by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company. (Staskiewicz, Benjamin) |
|
Filing 15
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. SELF-REPRESENTED FILERS ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLY WITH THE JUDGE'S STANDARD ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER WHICH IS ATTACHED. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 9/8/2023.(Lewis, D)
|
|
Filing 14
ORDER granting #11 Motion for Order to Participate in Electronic Filing. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 9/8/2023. (Lewis, D)
|
| Filing 12 MOTION for Writ Ordering State Court Clerk to Provide a Complete Copy of All Records and Proceedings in State Court by Paul R. Koch. (Chartier, A) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for by Self-Represented Litigant to Participate in Electronic Filing by Paul R. Koch. (Chartier, A) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Extension of Time to File a Response as to #9 First MOTION to Remand to State Court until 30 days from Friday, September 8, 2023 to Monday, October 9, 2023 by Paul R. Koch. (Chartier, A) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER. Defendant may file any objection or other response to the motion to remand (Doc. #9 ) on or before September 8, 2023. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/30/2023.(Lewis, D) Modified on 8/31/2023 (Lewis, D).
|
| Filing 9 First MOTION to Remand to State Court by Deutsche Bank National Trust Company.Responses due by 9/19/2023 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memo in Support and Exhibits)(Staskiewicz, Benjamin) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE - State Court Notice by Paul R. Koch (Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 4 Appearance Self Represented Party by Paul R. Koch (Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE TO COUNSEL NOT ADMITTED TO THE BAR OF THE US DISTRICT COURT OF CONNECTICUT Re: Local Rule 83.1 Admission of Attorneys. The above captioned case has been received and filed in our court. Please see our Local Rule 83.1 regarding Admission of Attorneys that is available on our website at www.ctd.uscourts.gov. You will not be added to the case, nor will we accept further filings until you have complied with Local Rule 83.1. If you have any questions about this procedure, please contact the Clerk's Office. Signed by Clerk on 7/31/2023.(Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 7/31/2023.(Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Paul R. Koch from Superior Court at Norwalk Housing Session, case number NWH-CV19-6005016-S, filed by Paul R. Koch. (Attachments: #1 civil cover sheet)(Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing fee received from Lexene Charles f/b/o Paul Koch: $ 402.00, receipt number BPT-13817. (Imbriani, Susan) |
| Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer and Judge S. Dave Vatti added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
