Chambers v. Commissioner of Social Security
| Natasha Chambers |
| Commissioner of Social Security |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2023cv01040 |
| August 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Maria E Garcia |
| Michael P Shea |
| Robert M Spector |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Robert M. Spector on 8/18/2023. (Langello, Nicholas)
|
| Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Natasha Chambers, Commissioner of Social Security. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Robert M. Spector. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 8/16/2023.(Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by John Molinaro on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Molinaro, John) |
| Filing 9 First NOTICE by Natasha Chambers consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction (Zimberlin, Russell) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, along with a financial affidavit. Plaintiff has fully completed the required information. She asserts that she is unable to afford to pay fees and costs. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that Plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Court has also reviewed the Complaint, ECF No. 1, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and finds the claim is sufficient to proceed to service of process on the defendant.Signed by Judge Maria E. Garcia on 8/7/23. (Esposito, A.)
|
| Filing 8 Notice of New SSA Action: Electronic service of the complaint was made by the Clerk's Office upon the Social Security Office of General Counsel and the US Attorney's Office for the District of Connecticut. (Chartier, A) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE to Counsel: Due to privacy restrictions on social security cases, absent both a consent to electronic notice and an approved motion for efiling privileges, counsel must mail paper copies to self-represented litigants. Signed by Clerk on 8/4/2023.(Chartier, A) |
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 8/4/2023.(Chartier, A)
|
|
Filing 5
Standing ORDER Re: Social Security Cases. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 8/4/2023.(Chartier, A)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing ORDER on Social Security Appeals. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 8/4/2023. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Chartier, A)
|
| Answer deadline updated for Commissioner of Social Security to 10/4/2023. (Chartier, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Natasha Chambers. (Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Commissioner of Social Security, filed by Natasha Chambers. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Cover Letter)(Anastasio, F.) |
| Judge Michael P. Shea and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
