Batiz v. USA
Petitioner: Heriberto Batiz
Respondent: USA
Case Number: 3:2023cv01047
Filed: August 7, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Thomas O Farrish
Referring Judge: Alvin W Thompson
Nature of Suit: Mandamus & Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER: Petitioner's Motion to Compel (Docket No. #11 ) is DENIED as moot. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 09/27/2023. (Vascotto, J.)
September 25, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: The petitioner's Writ of Mandamus (ECF No. #1 ) is hereby DENIED for the reasons set forth in the attached document. The Clerk shall close this case. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 9/25/2023. (Vascotto, J.)
September 21, 2023 Filing 11 MOTION to Compel, by Heriberto Batiz. (Mendez, D)
August 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER granting #7 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 8/21/23. (Pesta, J.)
August 18, 2023 Filing 8 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Heriberto Batiz. (Mendez, D)
August 18, 2023 Filing 7 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis, by Heriberto Batiz. (Mendez, D)
August 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 8/7/2023. (Ferguson, L.)
August 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 STANDING ORDER on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 8/7/2023. (Ferguson, L.)
August 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Alvin W. Thompson on 8/7/2023. (Ferguson, L.)
August 7, 2023 Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 8/7/2023. (Oliver, T.)
August 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: We received your Motion for Writ of Mandamus which has been assigned case number 3:23-cv-1047. In order to proceed, the filing fee or a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis must be submitted to the Court by 9/6/2023 or the case will be subject to dismissal. Fee information and the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis form may be found on the Court's website at ctd.uscourts.gov. Dismissal due by 9/6/2023 Signed by Clerk on 8/7/2023. (Oliver, T.)
August 7, 2023 Filing 1 MOTION for Writ of Mandamus by Heriberto Batiz. (Oliver, T.)
August 7, 2023 Judge Alvin W. Thompson and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Oliver, T.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Batiz v. USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Heriberto Batiz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: USA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?