Gray v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company
| Catherine Gray |
| Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company |
| 3:2023cv01069 |
| August 10, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert N Chatigny |
| Robert M Spector |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 16
ORDER granting #14 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to 10/16/2023 for Defendant to answer, move against, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 9/14/2023. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
|
Filing 15
ORDER: Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 9/14/2023. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
|
Answer deadline updated for Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company to 10/16/2023. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
|
Filing 14
Second MOTION for Extension of Time until October 16, 2023for Defendant to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company. (Jimenez-Franck, Andres)
|
|
Filing 13
Notice re Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Clerk on 9/5/2023. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(Samson, Jessalyn)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER granting #11 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to 9/16/2023 to answer, move against, or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 8/15/2023. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
|
Filing 11
First MOTION for Extension of Time until September 16, 2023 to Respond to Plaintiff's Complaint by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company. (Stretton, John)
|
|
Answer deadline updated for Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company to 9/16/2023. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
|
Filing 10
NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #8 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, #3 Notice (Other) filed by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, #2 Notice (Other) filed by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, #4 Disclosure Statement filed by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, #7 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 6 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #9 Protective Order, #5 Notice of Appearance filed by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company Signed by Clerk on 8/10/2023. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removed Cases)(Samson, Jessalyn)
|
|
Filing 9
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 8/10/2023.(Samson, Jessalyn)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 8/10/2023.(Samson, Jessalyn)
|
|
Filing 7
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/9/2023. Discovery due by 2/9/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 3/15/2024. Signed by Clerk on 8/10/2023.(Samson, Jessalyn)
|
|
Filing 6
Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 8/10/23.(Hushin, Z.)
|
|
Filing 5
NOTICE of Appearance by John Gerard Stretton on behalf of Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company (Stretton, John)
|
|
Filing 4
Disclosure Statement by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company. (Jimenez-Franck, Andres) Modified on 8/10/2023 to correct party (Hushin, Z.).
|
|
Filing 3
NOTICE by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company Statement Pursuant to the U.S. District Court District of Connecticut Standing Order on Removed Cases (Jimenez-Franck, Andres) Modified on 8/10/2023 to correct party (Hushin, Z.).
|
|
Filing 2
NOTICE by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company Notice of No Pending Motions (Jimenez-Franck, Andres) Modified on 8/10/2023 to correct party(Hushin, Z.).
|
|
Filing 1
NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company from Rockville Superior Court, case number TTD-CV23-6027571-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-7444786, filed by Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B)(Jimenez-Franck, Andres) Modified on 8/10/2023 to correct party (Hushin, Z.).
|
|
Judge Robert N. Chatigny and Judge Robert M. Spector added. (Freberg, B)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gray v. Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Catherine Gray | |
| Represented By: | Rebecca M. Harris |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company | |
| Represented By: | Andres Jimenez-Franck |
| Represented By: | John Gerard Stretton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
