Maloney v. Maloney
| Susan Maloney |
| Tara Maloney |
| 3:2023cv01083 |
| August 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Thomas O Farrish |
| Sarala V Nagala |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1355 Petition for Return of Property |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 MOTION for a hold on case, by Susan Maloney. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 15 The Defendant's Answer to the #1 Complaint, by Tara Maloney. (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 14 Appearance Self Represented Party, by Tara Maloney. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Mendez, D) (Additional attachment(s) added on 10/4/2023: #2 Notice of Pro Se Appearance) (Mendez, D). |
| Set Deadline: Show Cause Response due by 10/13/2023. (Bozek, M.) |
Filing 13
ORDER granting in part #12 Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time. Plaintiff's response to this Court's show cause order at ECF No. 10 shall be due by October 13, 2023. Plaintiff is reminded that she may wish to consult with the Federal Pro Se Program at New Haven Legal Assistance Association, which is reachable at nhlegal.org/federalprose. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 9/25/2023.(Piccolo, Marissa)
|
| Filing 12 Letter/MOTION for Extension of Time by Susan Maloney re Dkt. 10 Order to Show Cause. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Shafer, J.) |
| Filing 11 Letter from Susan Maloney Dated September 1, 2023. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (Mendez, D) |
| Set Deadline: Show Cause Response due by 9/22/2023. (Bozek, M.) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The Court has reviewed Plaintiff's filings in response to its order to show cause at ECF No. 7. Upon further review, the Court notes that Plaintiff Maloney names the Middletown Probate Court as a second defendant in her complaint. ECF No. 1 at 2. To the extent that Plaintiff seeks to challenge a prior state court judgment against her, this Court may lack subject matter jurisdiction under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. See Ashby v. Polinsky, 328 F. App'x 20, 21 (2d Cir. 2009) (citing Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co., 263 U.S. 413 (1923), and D.C. Ct. of App. v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462 (1983)). Accordingly, no later than September 22, 2023, Plaintiff shall show cause why the Rooker-Feldman doctrine would not deprive the Court of subject matter jurisdiction over her claim against the Middletown Probate Court. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 9/7/2023.(Piccolo, Marissa)
|
| Filing 9 Amendment to the Disclosure Statement re #8 , by Susan Maloney. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Mendez, D) |
| Filing 8 Disclosure Statement, by Susan Maloney. (Attachments: #1 Exhibits, #2 Envelope) (Mendez, D) |
| Set Deadline: Show Cause Response due by 9/1/2023. (Bozek, M.) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provide that, if the Court determines at any time that it lacks subject matter jurisdiction, it must dismiss the action. Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). In order for this Court to exercise subject matter jurisdiction, either (1) the plaintiff must set forth a colorable claim arising under the U.S. Constitution or a federal statute, thus invoking this Court's federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. 1331; or (2) there must be complete diversity of citizenship between the plaintiff and the defendant and the amount in controversy must exceed $75,000 under 28 U.S.C. 1332. See DaSilva v. Kinsho Int'l Corp., 229 F.3d 358, 363 (2d Cir. 2000) (identifying the two categories of subject matter jurisdiction). This action appears to involve two Connecticut residents in a property dispute. Plaintiff also cites a Connecticut identity theft statute. Accordingly, no later than September 1, 2023, Plaintiff shall respond to this order explaining why she believes this Court has subject matter jurisdiction over the instant case. In responding to the Order, Plaintiff may wish to consult with the Federal Pro Se Program at New Haven Legal Assistance Association, which is reachable at nhlegal.org/federalprose. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 8/16/2023.(Piccolo, Marissa)
|
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Protective Order, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #1 Complaint filed by Susan Maloney. Signed by Clerk on 8/16/2023. (Mendez, D) |
|
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 8/15/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 8/15/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/14/2023. Discovery due by 2/14/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 3/20/2024. Signed by Clerk on 8/15/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 8/15/2023. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Tara Maloney, filed by Susan Maloney. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Peterson, M) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/15/2023: #2 Exhibits) (Peterson, M). |
| Filing fee received from Joel Pringal (For Susan Maloney): $ 402.00, receipt number To Be Receipted. (Peterson, M) |
| Judge Sarala V. Nagala and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Shafer, J.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Maloney v. Maloney | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Susan Maloney | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Tara Maloney | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
