Rodriguez v. Connecticut Renaissance
| Luis Rodriguez |
| Connecticut Renaissance |
| 3:2023cv01090 |
| August 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| New Haven Office |
| Jeffrey A Meyer |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER RE AMENDED COMPLAINT. The Court has reviewed the amended complaint and decided that it is not necessarily subject to dismissal at this time. The Court has concerns, however, that the complaint lacks information required under Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure including a statement of the Court's jurisdiction and a statement of the relief sought. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(1), 8(a)(3). In addition, the allegations of the complaint appear to go into details well beyond what is needed for "a short and plain statement of the claim," see id. 8(a)(2), and the complaint lacks any allegations with respect to individual claims for relief and under which particular provisions of the law. It is likely that in the event that the defendant is served with the complaint and files a motion to dismiss, the Court may grant a motion to dismiss because of the defects in the complaint. Therefore, if plaintiff wishes to avoid substantial delay and possible dismissal of his complaint, the Court strongly recommends that plaintiff (1) retain counsel to draft a proper amended complaint or (2) promptly contact the Federal Pro Se Legal Assistance program for assistance from attorney Cat Itaya with respect to the drafting and filing of an amended complaint that may stand a better chance to withstand a motion to dismiss. Contact information can be found at https://nhlegal.org/federalprose/ or by telephone (203) 850-7720. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 10/13/2023. (Parker, B.)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS (Doc. #2 ). The Court GRANTS plaintiff's motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. It is so ordered.Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 10/13/2023. (Parker, B.)
|
| Filing 8 AMENDED COMPLAINT against Connecticut Renaissance, filed by Luis Rodriguez.(Chartier, A) |
|
Filing 7
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY COMPLAINT SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED. It appears that the complaint is subject to dismissal under 1915(e)(2)(B). But if Rodriguez has grounds to file an amended complaint or to show why the complaint should not be dismissed, he may file the amended complaint or a response to this order to show cause by August 27, 2023. If he files an amended complaint, he should ensure that the complaint includes allegations of specific facts to show what employees at Connecticut Renaissance did or said that make it plausible to believe that he was subject to discrimination because of his race, his national origin, and/or a disability. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/17/2023. (Pincus, K.)
|
|
Filing 6
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/15/2023.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 8/15/2023.(Freberg, B)
|
|
Filing 4
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/14/2023; Discovery due by 2/14/2024; Dispositive Motions due by 3/20/2024. Signed by Clerk on 8/15/2023.(Freberg, B)
|
| Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 8/15/2023.(Freberg, B) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Luis Rodriguez. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Connecticut Renaissance, filed by Luis Rodriguez.(Freberg, B) |
| Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer and Judge S. Dave Vatti added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Rodriguez v. Connecticut Renaissance | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Luis Rodriguez | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Connecticut Renaissance | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
