Mcmahon v. Kijakazi
| Andrew Mcmahon |
| Kilolo Kijakazi |
| Social Security Administration |
| 3:2023cv01099 |
| August 18, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE by Kilolo Kijakazi of filing of Unofficial Text-searchable Copy of Certified Administrative Record (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Unofficial text-searchable copy of Certified Administrative Record)(Molinaro, John) |
| Set Deadlines/Hearings: Dispositive Motions due by 12/4/2023. (Jacques, Djess) |
Filing 14
ORDER. The Government having filed the administrative record on October 4, 2023, the Court hereby enters the following Scheduling Order: Plaintiff shall file a motion to reverse and/or remand and supporting memorandum of law no later than November 3, 2023. Defendant shall then have until December 4, 2023, to file a motion to affirm or a motion for voluntary remand. Within 14 days after Defendant files its motion, Plaintiff may file a reply pursuant to Local Rule 7(d). Prior to the filing of any dispositive motions, the parties are encouraged to confer regarding the merits of the case in an effort to determine whether a reversal and voluntary remand are appropriate. The Court reminds the parties of the previously filed Standing Order which sets forth page limits and form and content requirements for motions and supporting memoranda. In addition to complying with these requirements, memoranda should avoid boilerplate discussions of the governing legal standards as the Court is familiar with the standard of review and the sequential evaluation process employed in the analysis of Social Security disability applications. The parties should focus on informing the Court of relevant and controlling legal authority and applying it to the facts of this case. Motions filed by the parties must comply with the requirements set forth above, in the Standing Order, and in the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to comply may result in denial of the motion. Any motion for extension of a deadline must comply with the Social Security Standing Order and Local Rule 7(b)(2) and must be filed at least three (3) days before the existing deadline. SO ORDERED at Bridgeport, Connecticut. Signed by Judge S. Dave Vatti on 10/5/2023. (Ellis, Bernadette)
|
| Filing 13 Social Security Transcripts. (Molinaro, John) |
| Filing 12 Docket Entry Correction re #11 Consent to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge, added signed consent form. (Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Kilolo Kijakazi, Andrew Mcmahon. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge S. Dave Vatti. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 8/23/2023.(Anastasio, F.) |
|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, along with a financial affidavit. Plaintiff has fully completed the required information. Plaintiff asserts that Plaintiff is unable to afford to pay fees and costs. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that Plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Court has also reviewed the Complaint (ECF No. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and finds the claim is sufficient to proceed to service of process on the defendant.Signed by Judge Maria E. Garcia on 8/22/23. (Cabral, Donald)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by John Molinaro on behalf of Kilolo Kijakazi (Molinaro, John) |
| Filing 8 Notice of New SSA Action: Electronic service of the complaint was made by the Clerk's Office upon the Social Security Office of General Counsel and the US Attorney's Office for the District of Connecticut. (Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel: Due to privacy restrictions on social security cases, absent both a consent to electronic notice and an approved motion for efiling privileges, counsel must mail paper copies to self-represented litigants. Signed by Clerk on 8/18/2023.(Anastasio, F.) |
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 8/18/2023.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 5
Standing Order Re: Social Security Cases Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 8/18/2023.(Anastasio, F.)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing Order on Social Security Appeals Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 8/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Anastasio, F.)
|
| Answer deadline updated for Kilolo Kijakazi to 10/17/2023. (Anastasio, F.) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Andrew Mcmahon Consent to Magistration Jurisdiction (Spat, Meryl) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Andrew Mcmahon. (Spat, Meryl) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Kilolo Kijakazi, filed by Andrew Mcmahon.(Spat, Meryl) |
| Judge Michael P. Shea and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
