Levine v. Stover
| Randy Levine |
| Stover |
| 3:2023cv01108 |
| August 21, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Maria E Garcia |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Stover re #7 MOTION to Dismiss Habeas Petition NOTICE TO PRO SE LITIGANT (Miller, Eric) |
| Filing 7 MOTION to Dismiss Habeas Petition by Stover.Responses due by 10/31/2023 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Dismiss, #2 Declaration of Jeffrey Moissonnier, #3 Exhibit A (Program Stmt 5800.15), #4 Exhibit B (Sentence Computation Data), #5 Exhibit C (Admission Release History), #6 Exhibit D (Detainer Action Letter), #7 Exhibit E (Email between CSD and CPD), #8 Exhibit F (Email between CPD and OIA), #9 Exhibit G (Program Stmt 5100.08), #10 Exhibit H (Request for Informal Resolution and Response), #11 Exhibit I (Administrative Remedy History))(Miller, Eric) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric Benjamin Miller on behalf of Stover (Miller, Eric) |
Filing 5
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. See attached. Show Cause Response due by October 10, 2023. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 09/07/2023.(Haider, Syeda)
|
| Filing fee received from Randy Levine: $ 5.00, receipt number BPT-13883. (Oliver, T.) |
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 8/21/2023. (Fanelle, N.) (Additional attachment(s) added on 8/21/2023: #1 Replacement pdf.) (Fanelle, N.).
|
|
Filing 3
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 8/21/2023. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: We received your Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus which has been assigned case number 3:23cv1108. In order to proceed, the filing fee or a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis must be submitted to the Court by 9/20/2023 or the case will be subject to dismissal. Fee information and the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis form may be found on the Court's website at ctd.uscourts.gov. Dismissal due by 9/20/2023 Signed by Clerk on 8/21/2023.(Imbriani, Susan)
|
| Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Randy Levine. (Attachments: #1 envelope)(Imbriani, Susan) |
| Judge Kari A. Dooley and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Levine v. Stover | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Randy Levine | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Stover | |
| Represented By: | Eric Benjamin Miller |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
