Bank of New York v. Consiglio et al
The Bank of New York and Bank of New York |
Andrew Consiglio and Heather Lindsay |
3:2023cv01115 |
August 22, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Thomas O Farrish |
Michael P Shea |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set Deadlines as to #9 First MOTION to Remand to State Court . Responses due by 11/13/2023 (Johnson, D.) |
Filing 13 ORDER. The #12 motion for extension of time is GRANTED. Defendant Lindsay will file a response to the pending motion to remand by November 13, 2023. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 10/13/2023. (Bassali, David) |
Filing 12 Emergency MOTION for Extension of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Motion for Remand by Heather Lindsay. (Bozek, M.) |
Set Deadlines as to #9 First MOTION to Remand to State Court . Responses due by 10/17/2023 (Johnson, D.) |
Filing 11 ORDER. Defendant Heather Lindsay's motion for extension of time, ECF No. #10 , is GRANTED. Defendant Lindsay will file a response to the pending motion to remand by October 17, 2023. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 9/20/2023. (Bassali, David) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Extension of Time for 30 Days to File a Response/Objection to #9 First MOTION to Remand to State Court by Heather Lindsay. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 9 First MOTION to Remand to State Court by The Bank of New York.Responses due by 9/18/2023 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Motion for Remand, #2 Exhibit A - State Trial Court Docket)(Knickerbocker, Jeffrey) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Jeffrey M. Knickerbocker on behalf of The Bank of New York (Knickerbocker, Jeffrey) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Heather Lindsay, #5 Electronic Filing Order, #4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Notice of Removal filed by Heather Lindsay, #6 Protective Order, 3 Notice re: Disclosure Statement Signed by Clerk on 8/23/2023. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removed Cases) (Peterson, M) |
Filing 6 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 08/22/2023. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 5 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 08/22/2023. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 4 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 10/21/2023. Discovery due by 2/21/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 3/27/2024. Signed by Clerk on 08/22/2023. (Peterson, M) |
Judge Michael P. Shea and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Nuzzi, Tiffany) |
Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 8/22/2023. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Heather Lindsay. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Heather Lindsay from Superior Court of the State of Connecticut for the Judicial District of Stamford/Norwalk, case number FST-CV08-5006978-S., filed by Heather Lindsay. (Fanelle, N.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.