Garuti v. NPL Construction Co.
Austin Garuti |
NPL Construction Co. |
3:2023cv01172 |
September 6, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Victor A Bolden |
Robert A Richardson |
Civil Rights: Jobs |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 23, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 12 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Jachimowski, Christy) |
Filing 11 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) with Affirmative Defenses by NPL Construction Co..(Jachimowski, Christy) |
Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Christy E. Jachimowski on behalf of NPL Construction Co. (Jachimowski, Christy) |
Filing 9 NOTICE by NPL Construction Co. re #7 Electronic Service Documents,, Notice of Compliance with Standing Order on Removed Cases 7-1 (Jachimowski, Christy) |
Filing 8 Second Disclosure Statement by NPL Construction Co. identifying Corporate Parent Oil & Gas Division LLC for NPL Construction Co.. (Jachimowski, Christy) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #5 Standing Protective Order, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #1 Notice of Removal, filed by NPL Construction Co., #6 Notice, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 9/7/2023. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removed Cases)(Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 6 NOTICE re: Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Clerk on 9/6/2023. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(Imbriani, Susan) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 9/6/23.(Hushin, Z.) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by NPL Construction Co. from Connecticut Superior Court, New Britain JD, case number HHB-CV23-6081152-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-7472728, filed by NPL Construction Co.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A-Complaint, #2 Exhibit B-Summons, #3 Exhibit C-Return of Service, #4 Exhibit D- Appearance, #5 Exhibit E- Docket Sheet)(Jachimowski, Christy) |
Judge Victor A. Bolden and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Garuti v. NPL Construction Co. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Austin Garuti | |
Represented By: | Matthew D. Paradisi |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: NPL Construction Co. | |
Represented By: | Christy E. Jachimowski |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.