Tucker v. City of New London
Plaintiff: Okoi Tucker
Defendant: City of New London
Case Number: 3:2023cv01212
Filed: September 15, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Thomas O Farrish
Referring Judge: Stefan R Underhill
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Jobs
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 24, 2023 Filing 20 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Okoi Tucker. (Sheer, John)
October 23, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 19 SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties' joint Rule 26(f) Report, doc. no. 17, is approved. Discovery due by 6/1/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 7/1/2024.Trial Ready Date within 45 days of the filing of Joint Trial Memorandum.Joint Trial Memorandum due 90 days after the close of discovery or 60 days from the ruling on the last dispositive motion. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 10/23/2023. (Friedle, H.)
October 23, 2023 Filing 18 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) with Affirmative Defenses by City of New London.(Smith, Elizabeth)
October 16, 2023 Filing 17 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Sheer, John)
October 6, 2023 Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Lorenzo J. Cicchiello on behalf of Okoi Tucker (Cicchiello, Lorenzo)
September 26, 2023 Filing 15 NOTICE re Initial Discovery Protocols For Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. Signed by Clerk on 9/26/2023. (Reis, Julia)
September 20, 2023 Answer deadline updated for City of New London to 10/23/2023. (Reis, Julia)
September 19, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER granting #13 Motion for Extension of Time until October 23, 2023 to respond to #1 Notice of Removal. Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 9/19/2023. (Friedle, H.)
September 18, 2023 Filing 13 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until October 23, 2023 To Respond to The Complaint #1 Notice of Removal by City of New London. (Smith, Elizabeth)
September 18, 2023 Filing 12 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #11 Notice, #2 Notice (Other) filed by City of New London, #6 Notice of Appearance filed by City of New London, #10 Protective Order, #8 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #3 Notice (Other) filed by City of New London, #1 Notice of Removal filed by City of New London, #4 Notice (Other) filed by City of New London, #5 Notice of Appearance filed by City of New London, #9 Electronic Filing Order, 7 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, Signed by Clerk on 9/18/2023. (Attachments: #1 Removal Standing Order) (Oliver, T.)
September 15, 2023 Filing 11 NOTICE re: Initial Discovery Protocols Signed by Clerk on 9/15/2023. (Attachments: #1 Discovery attachment) (Oliver, T.)
September 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 9/15/2023. (Oliver, T.)
September 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 9/15/2023. (Oliver, T.)
September 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 11/14/2023 Discovery due by 3/16/2024 Dispositive Motions due by 4/20/2024 Signed by Clerk on 9/15/2023. (Oliver, T.)
September 15, 2023 Filing 7 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 9/15/23.(Hushin, Z.)
September 15, 2023 Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Oliver, T.)
September 15, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Elizabeth Mott Smith on behalf of City of New London (Smith, Elizabeth)
September 15, 2023 Filing 5 NOTICE of Appearance by Johanna G. Zelman on behalf of City of New London (Zelman, Johanna)
September 15, 2023 Filing 4 NOTICE by City of New London of Pending Motions (Zelman, Johanna)
September 15, 2023 Filing 3 NOTICE by City of New London of Compliance with Standing Order in Removed Cases (Zelman, Johanna)
September 15, 2023 Filing 2 NOTICE by City of New London of Filing and Service of Notice of Removal (Zelman, Johanna)
September 15, 2023 Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by City of New London from New London Superior Court, case number KNL-CV23-6063194-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-7483138, filed by City of New London.(Zelman, Johanna)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Tucker v. City of New London
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Okoi Tucker
Represented By: John Erich Sheer
Represented By: Lorenzo J. Cicchiello
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: City of New London
Represented By: Johanna G. Zelman
Represented By: Elizabeth Mott Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?