Dull v. Commissioner of Correction
Petitioner: Nathan G Dull and Nathan G. Dull
Respondent: Commissioner of Correction
Case Number: 3:2023cv01220
Filed: September 12, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Thomas O Farrish
Referring Judge: Sarala V Nagala
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Set Deadline: Show Cause Response due by 12/1/2023. (Bozek, M.)
October 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. It is hereby ORDERED that the Respondent file a response on or before December 1, 2023, why the relief prayed for in the petition for writ of habeas corpus should not be granted, and it is ORDERED that the Clerk of Court serve a copy of this Order and a copy of the petition and all attachments, to respondents representative, Supervisory Assistant States Attorney Angela R. Macchiarulo, by e-mail, on or before October 31, 2023. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 10/13/2023.(Piccolo, Marissa)
October 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing fee received from Nathan Dull (State of CT Dept of Correction): $ 5.00, receipt number 20674 (Hartford). (Peterson, M)
September 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 9/12/2023. (Mendez, D)
September 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 STANDING ORDER ON PRISONER ELECTRONIC FILING PROGRAM. Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 9/12/2023. (Mendez, D)
September 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 9/12/2023. (Mendez, D)
September 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: We received your Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus which has been assigned case number In order to proceed, the filing fee or a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis must be submitted to the Court by 10/12/2023 or the case will be subject to dismissal. Fee information and the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis form may be found on the Court's website at ctd.uscourts.gov. Dismissal due by 10/12/2023 Signed by Clerk on 9/12/2023.(Chartier, A)
September 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Nathan G. Dull. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Chartier, A)
September 12, 2023 Opinion or Order Judge Sarala V. Nagala and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Freberg, B)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Dull v. Commissioner of Correction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nathan G Dull
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Nathan G. Dull
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Commissioner of Correction
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?