Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Bell
| Progressive Casualty Insurance Company |
| Helena Bell |
| 3:2023cv01295 |
| October 4, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert N Chatigny |
| Maria E Garcia |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgment |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. Helena Bell served on 10/25/2023, answer due 11/15/2023. (Cannavino, John) |
| Filing 8 Disclosure Statement by Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. (Cannavino, John) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Helena Bell* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *John Wade Cannavino, Jr.* *Ryan Ryan Deluca, LLP - Stamford* *707 Summer Street* *Stamford, CT 06901*. (Shafer, J.) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #5 Standing Protective Order, Dkt. 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #1 Complaint, #4 Electronic Filing Order, and #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines. Signed by Clerk on 10-5-2023. (Shafer, J.) |
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 10-4-2023. (Shafer, J.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 10-4-2023. (Shafer, J.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: amended pleadings due by 12-3-2023, discovery due by 4-4-2024, and dispositive motions due by 5-9-2024. Signed by Clerk on 10-4-2023. (Shafer, J.)
|
| Judge Robert N. Chatigny and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 10/4/23.(Hushin, Z.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Helena Bell ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7504382.), filed by Progressive Casualty Insurance Company.(Cannavino, John) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Helena Bell. (Cannavino, John) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Progressive Casualty Insurance Company v. Bell | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Progressive Casualty Insurance Company | |
| Represented By: | John Wade Cannavino, Jr. |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Helena Bell | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
