Stanisic v. Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.
| Radmilo Stanisic, Lisa Allen, Olivia MacKenzie, Charles Hunker, Corey Eheart and Ellen Mahoney |
| Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv01340 |
| October 13, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Robert N Chatigny |
| Maria E Garcia |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 23 NOTICE by Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. re 17 Order on Motion for Admission Pro Hac Vice (Attachments: #1 Certificate of Good Standing of James Vogts)(Laney, Robert) |
| Filing 22 Set/Reset Deadlines as to #18 First MOTION to Remand to State Court . Responses due by 12/22/2023. (Rickevicius, L.) |
Filing 21
ORDER granting #20 Consent Motion for Extension of Time to 12/22/2023 to File Response/Reply re #18 First MOTION to Remand, and to 1/19/2024 for plaintiff to file a reply to the objection. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 11/18/2023. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Filing 20 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to #18 First MOTION to Remand to State Court until 12/22/2023 by Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.. (Laney, Robert) |
|
Filing 19
ORDER granting #15 Consent Motion for Extension of Time until twenty-eight (28) days after a decision on #18 Motion to remand to complete the parties' Rule 26(f) planning conference. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 11/14/2023. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Filing 18 First MOTION to Remand to State Court by Radmilo Stanisic.Responses due by 12/4/2023 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support of Motion to Remand, #2 Exhibit 1 - Revised Complaint, #3 Exhibit 2 - Objection to Request to Amend Complaint, #4 Exhibit 3 - Plaintiff's Reply ISO Amended Complaint, #5 Exhibit 4 - State Court Order)(Ranks, Andrew) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER granting #16 Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice for Attorney James Vogts. Certificate of Good Standing due by 1/12/2024. Signed by Clerk on 11/13/2023. (Samson, Jessalyn)
|
| Filing 16 MOTION for Attorney(s) James Vogts to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7545550) by Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Affidavit of James Vogts)(Laney, Robert) |
| Filing 15 First MOTION for Extension of Time until twenty-eight (28) days after decision on motion to remand to complete 26(f) planning conference by Radmilo Stanisic. (Ranks, Andrew) |
| Filing 14 NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew Patrick Garza on behalf of Radmilo Stanisic (Garza, Andrew) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER granting #12 Consent Motion for Extension of Time until twenty-eight (28) days after a decision on motion to remand to respond to plaintiffs' Amended Complaint. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 10/23/2023. (Rickevicius, L.)
|
| Filing 12 First MOTION for Extension of Time until twenty-eight (28) days after decision on motion to remand to respond to plaintiffs' Amended Complaint by Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.. (Laney, Robert) |
| Filing 11 NOTICE by Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. Statement in Compliance with Standing Order on Removed Cases (Laney, Robert) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #8 Electronic Filing Order, #5 Notice (Other) filed by Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc., #3 Notice (Other) filed by Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc., #1 Notice of Removal, filed by Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc., #2 Disclosure Statement filed by Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc., #7 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 6 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #9 Protective Order, #4 Jury Demand filed by Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. Signed by Clerk on 10/16/2023. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order on Removed Cases)(Samson, Jessalyn) |
|
Filing 9
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 10/13/2023.(Samson, Jessalyn)
|
|
Filing 8
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 10/13/2023.(Samson, Jessalyn)
|
|
Filing 7
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 12/12/2023. Discovery due by 4/13/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 5/18/2024. Signed by Clerk on 10/13/2023.(Samson, Jessalyn)
|
| Filing 6 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 10/13/2023.(Perez, J.) |
| Judge Robert N. Chatigny and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE by Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. Notice to Counsel (Laney, Robert) |
| Filing 4 DEMAND for Trial by Jury by Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.. (Laney, Robert) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE by Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. Notice of No Pending Motions (Laney, Robert) |
| Filing 2 Disclosure Statement by Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.. (Laney, Robert) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc. from Connecticut Superior Court, case number X06-UWY-CV-23-6072789-S. Filing fee $ 402 receipt number ACTDC-7514642, filed by Sturm, Ruger & Company, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet, #2 Exhibit Original Complaint, #3 Exhibit Amended Complaint)(Laney, Robert) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
