Day v. Town of Naugatuck et al
| Jarell Day |
| Town of Naugatuck, Officer Nicholas D. Kehoss and Nicholas D. Kehoss |
| 3:2023cv01560 |
| November 29, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Michael P Shea |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 NOTICE of Appearance by James G. Williams on behalf of Town of Naugatuck (Williams, James) |
| Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jarell Day. Nicholas D. Kehoss served on 12/27/2023, answer due 1/17/2024. (Sheffy, Anthony) |
| Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Jarell Day. Town of Naugatuck served on 12/21/2023, answer due 1/11/2024. (Sheffy, Anthony) |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Nicholas D. Kehoss, Town of Naugatuck * with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Anthony Alan Sheffy* *Sheffy, DeNigris, Grey & Bedard, LLP* *166 North Main Street* *Southington, CT 06489*. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 9 ENTERED IN ERROR: ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Nicholas D. Kehoss, Town of Naugatuck * with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Anthony Alan Sheffy* *Sheffy, Mazzaccaro, DePaolo & DeNigris* *166 North Main Street* *Southington, CT 06489*. (Peterson, M) Modified on 12/14/2023.Reissued Summons. Incorrect firm name listed (Peterson, M). |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Sheffy, Anthony) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Kelly J Grey on behalf of Jarell Day (Grey, Kelly) |
| Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Nicholas D. Kehoss, Town of Naugatuck * with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Anthony Alan Sheffy* *Sheffy, Mazzaccaro, DePaolo & DeNigris* *166 North Main Street* *Southington, CT 06489*. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Electronic Filing Order, #5 Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by Jarell Day, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines Signed by Clerk on 12/1/2023. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 11/29/2023. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 11/29/2023. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 1/28/2024. Discovery due by 5/30/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 7/4/2024. Signed by Clerk on 11/29/2023. (Peterson, M)
|
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 11/29/2023.(Perez, J.) |
| Judge Michael P Shea and Judge S. Dave Vatti added. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $402 receipt number ACTDC-7564937.), filed by Jarell Day.(Sheffy, Anthony) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Sheffy, Anthony) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
