Hines v. Hines et al
| Marquese Hines |
| Shameka Hines, Joe Biden, Donald J. Trump, Telly Hines and Marquick |
| 3:2023cv01567 |
| November 30, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Maria E Garcia |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 RECOMMENDED RULING Denying #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Marquese Hines. Objections due by 12/26/2023.Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, along with a financial affidavit. Plaintiff has substantially completed the required information, albeit predominantly with indecipherable handwriting. However, it appears that that Plaintiff represented under penalty of perjury: (1) that he generates $6,000 to $8,000 per week in pre-tax income from his self-employment; (2) that he has $0 in monthly obligations; and (3) that his real propertys estimated value is $85 million (but see Hines v. Leah Arihess Family et al, No. 23-cv-1571-VAB, in which the same Plaintiff contemporaneously filed another financial affidavit attesting that his real property is worth approximately $250 million). Based on Plaintiffs own representations, this Court finds that Plaintiff--with $85 million of assets, no liabilities, over $6,000 of weekly income, and no obligations--is able to afford to pay the ordinary $402 filing fee required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, Plaintiff must either pay the filing fee or object to this recommended ruling by December 25, 2023, or his case may be dismissed.This is a recommended ruling. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(1). Any objections to this recommended ruling must be filed with the Clerk of the Court on or before 12/26/2023. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2) (objections to recommended ruling due fourteen days after being served); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d) (three days added where service is by mail); Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(a)(1)(c) (extending a deadline that otherwise would fall on a legal holiday). Failure to object by that date will preclude appellate review. See 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72 and 6(a); D. Conn. L. Civ. R. 72.2; Small v. Secretary of H.H.S., 892 F.2d 15 (2d Cir. 1989) (per curiam); F.D.I.C. v. Hillcrest Assoc., 66 F.3d 566, 569 (2d Cir. 1995).Signed by Judge Maria E. Garcia on 12/8/23. (Cabral, Donald) |
Filing 7
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Maria E. Garcia for Ruling on #2 Motion for In Forma Pauperis. Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 12/1/2023.(Murphy, Tatihana)
|
|
Filing 6
Standing PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 11/30/2023.(Barry, L)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 11/30/2023.(Barry, L)
|
|
Filing 4
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 1/29/2024 Discovery due by 5/31/2024 Dispositive Motions due by 7/5/2024 Signed by Clerk on 11/30/2023.(Barry, L)
|
| Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 11/30/2023. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marquese Hines. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Joe Biden, Shameka Hines, Telly Hines, Marquick, Donald J. Trump, filed by Marquese Hines. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Judge Victor A. Bolden and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Reis, Julia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
