State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Anderson et al
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company |
Garcia K Anderson, Megan K Maczuga, Patricia Maczuga, United States of America, Garcia K. Anderson, Megan K. Maczuga and USA |
3:2023cv01605 |
December 9, 2023 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Kari A Dooley |
Thomas O Farrish |
Motor Vehicle |
28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 13 SUMMONS Returned Executed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. USA served on 12/20/2023, answer due 2/18/2024. (Spadaccini, Louis) |
Filing 12 SUMMONS Returned Executed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Megan K. Maczuga served on 12/20/2023, answer due 1/10/2024. (Spadaccini, Louis) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Patricia Maczuga served on 12/20/2023, answer due 1/10/2024. (Spadaccini, Louis) |
Filing 10 SUMMONS Returned Executed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Garcia K. Anderson served on 12/20/2023, answer due 1/10/2024. (Spadaccini, Louis) |
Filing 9 Disclosure Statement by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Spadaccini, Louis) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Megan K. Maczuga, Patricia Maczuga* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Louis Anthony Spadaccini* *Blackwell, Davis & Spadaccini, LLC* *158 East Center Street* *Manchester, CT 06040*. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Garcia K. Anderson, USA* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Louis Anthony Spadaccini* *Blackwell, Davis & Spadaccini, LLC* *158 East Center Street* *Manchester, CT 06040*. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, #5 Protective Order. Signed by Clerk on 12/11/2023. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/9/2023. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 12/9/2023. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 2/7/2024 Discovery due by 6/9/2024 Dispositive Motions due by 7/14/2024 Signed by Clerk on 12/9/2023. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 12/9/2023.(Perez, J.) |
Judge Kari A. Dooley and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Freberg, B) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7577172.), filed by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Spadaccini, Louis) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Spadaccini, Louis) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.