Schwaller v. Target Stores, Inc.
| Sally Schwaller |
| Target Stores, Inc. |
| 3:2023cv01622 |
| December 15, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Maria E Garcia |
| Sarala V Nagala |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
| Defendant |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 30, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Set Deadline: Discovery due by 6/15/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 7/20/2024. Status Report due by 3/15/2024. (Bozek, Michael) |
Filing 19
SCHEDULING ORDER. All discovery shall be completed by June 15, 2024. Dispositive motions shall be filed by July 20, 2024. First status report due March 15, 2024. Second status report due June 24, 2024. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 1/30/2024.(Piccolo, Marissa)
|
| Filing 18 Joint REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Neborsky, Dawn) |
| Filing 17 Disclosure Statement by Sally Schwaller. (Hillis, Michael) |
| Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Stanton Hillis on behalf of Sally Schwaller (Hillis, Michael) |
| Filing 15 ANSWER to Complaint (Notice of Removal) (DEFENDANT TARGET STORES, INC.S ANSWER, AFFIRMATIVE DEFENSES AND JURY CLAIM ) by Target Stores, Inc..(Neborsky, Dawn) |
| Answer deadline updated to 1-3-2024. (Shafer, J.) |
|
Filing 14
ORDER. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 81(c)(2)(C), Defendant must answer or present other defenses or objections to Plaintiff's complaint within seven days after its notice of removal is filed. Because Defendant filed its notice of removal on December 15, 2023, Defendant would need to do so by December 22, 2023. As this deadline falls amongst Court holidays, the Court will sua sponte extend this deadline to January 3, 2024. Should Plaintiff file a motion to remand this action, the Court will vacate this response deadline until after it decides that motion. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 12/19/2023.(Piccolo, Marissa)
|
| Filing 13 STANDING ORDER ON REMOVED CASES. Signed by Clerk on 12/15/2023. (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Notice (Other) filed by Target Stores, Inc., #11 Standing Protective Order, #6 Notice (Other) filed by Target Stores, Inc., #3 Notice of Appearance filed by Target Stores, Inc., #9 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Disclosure Statement filed by Target Stores, Inc., #10 Electronic Filing Order, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #1 Notice of Removal filed by Target Stores, Inc., #8 Notice (Other) filed by Target Stores, Inc., #7 Notice (Other) filed by Target Stores, Inc. Signed by Clerk on 12/15/2023. (Mendez, D) |
|
Filing 11
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 12/15/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 10
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 12/15/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 9
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 2/13/2024. Discovery due by 6/15/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 7/20/2024. Signed by Clerk on 12/15/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
| Filing 8 NOTICE by Target Stores, Inc. CERTIFICATION OF FILING COPY OF NOTICE OF REMOVAL IN STATE COURT (Neborsky, Dawn) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE by Target Stores, Inc. STATEMENT PURSUANT TO STANDING ORDER IN REMOVED CASES (Neborsky, Dawn) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE by Target Stores, Inc. CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS NOTICES AND ORDERS (Neborsky, Dawn) |
| Filing 5 Disclosure Statement (Rule 7.1) by Target Stores, Inc.. (Neborsky, Dawn) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE by Target Stores, Inc. NOTICE OF NO PENDING MOTIONS IN STATE COURT (Neborsky, Dawn) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Appearance by Dawn M. Neborsky on behalf of Target Stores, Inc. (Neborsky, Dawn) |
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 12/15/23.(Hushin, Z.) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Target Stores, Inc. from JD of Ansonia/Milford at Milford, case number AAN-CV-6053768-S. Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACTDC-7584282, filed by Target Stores, Inc..(Neborsky, Dawn) |
| Set deadline: Rule 26 meeting report due by 1-29-2024. (Shafer, J.) |
| Judge Sarala V. Nagala and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Schwaller v. Target Stores, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Sally Schwaller | |
| Represented By: | John P. Sponheimer |
| Represented By: | Michael Stanton Hillis |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Target Stores, Inc. | |
| Represented By: | Dawn M. Neborsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
