Aerotek, Inc. v. Power Industries, LLC
Aerotek, Inc |
Power Industries, LLC |
3:2023cv01643 |
December 20, 2023 |
U.S. District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Stefan R Underhill |
S Dave Vatti |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Power Industries, LLC waiver sent on 1/5/2024, answer due 3/5/2024 filed by Aerotek, Inc. (Greenspoon, Lauren) |
Filing 10 Disclosure Statement by Power Industries, LLC. (Sweeney, William) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by William J Sweeney, Jr on behalf of Power Industries, LLC (Sweeney, William) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Power Industries, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Lauren R. Greenspoon* *Shook Hardy & Bacon LLP* *185 Asylum Street, Ste 37th Floor* *Hartford, CT 06103*. (Oliver, T.) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Power Industries, LLC. (Greenspoon, Lauren) |
Filing 7 First Disclosure Statement by Aerotek, Inc. (Greenspoon, Lauren) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Aerotek, Inc, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #5 Protective Order, #4 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 12/20/2023. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 5 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Senior District Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 12/20/2023. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Senior District Judge Stefan R. Underhill on 12/20/2023. (Oliver, T.) |
![]() |
Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 12/20/2023.(Maturo, F.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Power Industries, LLC ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7589767.), filed by Aerotek, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet)(Greenspoon, Lauren) |
Senior District Judge Stefan R. Underhill and Judge S. Dave Vatti added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Aerotek, Inc. v. Power Industries, LLC | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Aerotek, Inc | |
Represented By: | Lauren R. Greenspoon |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Power Industries, LLC | |
Represented By: | William J Sweeney, Jr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.