Reilly v. William Raveis Insurance Agency, LLC
| Tracy Reilly |
| William Raveis Insurance Agency, LLC |
| 3:2023cv01668 |
| December 22, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Vernon D Oliver |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *William Raveis Insurance Agency, LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Michael C. McMinn* *The McMinn Employment Law Firm, LLC* *1000 Lafayette Blvd. Suite 1100* *Bridgeport, CT 06604*. (Gaskins, A) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #1 Complaint filed by Tracy Reilly, #5 Protective Order, #6 Notice (Other), #4 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 12/26/2023.(Gaskins, A) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE re Initial Discovery Protocols (Attachments: #1 attachment)(Gaskins, A) |
Filing 5
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Vernon Dion Oliver on 12/22/2023.(Gaskins, A)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Vernon Dion Oliver on 12/22/2023.(Gaskins, A)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 2/20/2024 Discovery due by 6/22/2024 Dispositive Motions due by 7/27/2024 Signed by Clerk on 12/22/2023.(Gaskins, A)
|
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 12/22/2023.(Maturo, F.) |
| Judge Vernon Dion Oliver and Judge S. Dave Vatti added. (Maturo, F.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against William Raveis Insurance Agency, LLC ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7593267.), filed by Tracy Reilly. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet)(McMinn, Michael) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to William Raveis Insurance Agency, LLC. (McMinn, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Reilly v. William Raveis Insurance Agency, LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Tracy Reilly | |
| Represented By: | Michael C. McMinn |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: William Raveis Insurance Agency, LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
