Stroud v. Stover et al
Petitioner: Marcus Stroud
Respondent: Stover and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Case Number: 3:2023cv01687
Filed: December 27, 2023
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Sarala V Nagala
Referring Judge: Robert A Richardson
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 12, 2024 Set deadline: Show Cause response due by 3-1-2024 per Dkt. 5. (Shafer, J.)
January 11, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE: Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2241. See ECF No. 1. It hereby is ORDERED that Respondent file a response on or before March 1, 2024, why the relief prayed for in the petition for writ of habeas corpus should not be granted. The court respectfully requests the Clerk of Court to serve a copy of this order, the initial petition, and all attachments to Respondent's representative, Assistant U.S. Attorney Michelle McConaghy, by email on or before January 26, 2024. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 1/11/2024. (Parfenoff, Ivan)
January 10, 2024 Filing fee received from Marcus Stroud: $ 5.00, receipt number BPT-14111. (Imbriani, Susan)
December 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 12-27-2023. (Shafer, J.)
December 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 12-27-2023. (Shafer, J.)
December 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: We received your Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus which has been assigned case number 3:23-cv-1687. In order to proceed, the filing fee or a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis must be submitted to the Court by 1/26/2024 or the case will be subject to dismissal. Fee information and the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis form may be found on the Court's website at ctd.uscourts.gov. Dismissal due by 1/26/2024. Signed by Clerk on 12/27/2023. (Peterson, M)
December 27, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Marcus Stroud. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Peterson, M)
December 27, 2023 Judge Sarala V. Nagala and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Shafer, J.)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Stroud v. Stover et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Marcus Stroud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Stover
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Federal Bureau of Prisons
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?