IEP Technologies, LLC v. KPM Analytics
| IEP Technologies, LLC |
| KPM Analytics North America Corporation and KPM Analytics |
| KPM Analytics, Incorporated, Statera Analytics, Incorporated and Process Sensors Corporation |
| Charter Communications, Inc. |
| 3:2023mc00051 |
| May 23, 2023 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarala V Nagala |
| Robert A Richardson |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 16, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER re #7 Non-party Debra Duguid's Objection. The objection filed by Ms. Duguid is sustained, in part, and overruled, in part. To the extent that Charter possesses responsive documents to KPM's subpoena which contain clearly personal and private information, such information should be appropriately redacted. As indicated by KPM in its response, "KPM would of course [] agree[] that social security numbers, bank account numbers, credit card numbers, and other irrelevant sensitive information could be partially redacted, leaving the last four digits unredacted." (Dkt. #8 at 4.) In conjunction with the protective order in place in the underlying litigation and the designation of any information produced in response to the contemplated subpoena as "Highly Confidential-Attorney's Eyes Only," Ms. Duguid's privacy concerns should be assuaged as it relates to this private information. However, the objection is overruled as it relates to the information concerning the "number and types of devices connected" to the designated IP address. The existence and use of electronic devices does not on its own, without some other compelling reason beyond unarticulated phishing concerns, justify further redaction or withholding of information. Should the parties have any further disagreements regarding the subpoena requests at issue in this matter, the parties are to meet and confer regarding their dispute prior to filing further motions. Signed by Judge Robert A. Richardson on 6/16/2023. (Fries, J.)
|
| Filing 8 RESPONSE re #7 Objection filed by KPM Analytics North America Corporation, KPM Analytics, Incorporated. (Rosenberg, Aaron) |
| Filing 7 OBJECTION re #5 Order on Motion to Compel Subpoena Compliance filed by Debra Duguid. (Ball, Stephen) |
| Filing 6 Disclosure Statement by KPM Analytics North America Corporation, KPM Analytics, Incorporated. (Rosenberg, Aaron) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER denying as moot #1 Motion to Compel Subpoena Compliance in light of the parties joint stipulation (dkt. #4). See attached order. Signed by Judge Robert A. Richardson on 5/25/2023. (Fries, J.)
|
| Filing 4 STIPULATION re #1 MOTION to Compel Subpoena Compliance (paid $49 fee; receipt number ACTDC-7356765) by KPM Analytics North America Corporation, KPM Analytics, Incorporated. (Attachments: #1 Text of Proposed Order Exhibit 1 - Proposed Order)(Rosenberg, Aaron) |
|
Filing 3
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson for a ruling on #1 MOTION to Compel Subpoena Compliance. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 5/25/2023.Motion referred to Robert A. Richardson(Bozek, M.)
|
|
Filing 2
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 5/23/2023. (Mendez, D)
|
| Judge Sarala V. Nagala added. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to Compel Subpoena Compliance (paid $49 fee; receipt number ACTDC-7356765), filed by KPM Analytics, Incorporated, KPM Analytics North America Corporation.Responses due by 6/13/2023 (Attachments: #1 Memorandum in Support Memorandum of Law, #2 Affidavit Declaration of Charles M. Landrum III, #3 Exhibit Exhibit A - Supbpoena, #4 Exhibit Exhibit B - Email, #5 Exhibit Exhibit C - Letter, #6 Exhibit Exhibit D - Invoice, #7 Exhibit Exhibit E - Letter, #8 Exhibit Exhibit F - Letter)(Rosenberg, Aaron) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
