Ramos v. Cheney et al
| Brandon Anthony Ramos |
| Cheney, Cauley, Scagliarini, Eliusseini, Zezima, Gross, Brysgel, Suol, Marshall, Annear, Classon, Eason, Velez, Perez, Hartenstein, Department of Corrections, Johnson and Hollister |
| 3:2024cv00006 |
| January 3, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Maria E Garcia |
| Michael P Shea |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
ORDER granting #8 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis; denying as moot #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 2/2/24. (Pesta, J.)
|
| Filing 9 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Brandon Anthony Ramos. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brandon Anthony Ramos. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF INSUFFICIENCY. The plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; in other words, he seeks to commence a federal lawsuit without pre-paying the filing fee. A federal law, 28 U.S.C. 1915, permits him to do so if, among other things, he submits a financial affidavit showing that he is unable to pay, accompanied by a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the six month period preceding his complaint. To assist inmates in demonstrating inability to pay, the District of Connecticut has prepared a standard-form in forma pauperis application.In this case, the plaintiff submitted the wrong in forma pauperis application form. He also did not submit a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement. His application is therefore insufficient. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to send the plaintiff a blank copy of the correct application form at his address of record. The plaintiff is directed to fill out the form completely and accurately, and to file it with the Clerk of the Court along with a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement covering at least the period from July 3, 2023 to January 3, 2024. If he does not do so by February 6, 2024, his case may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 1/16/2024.(Corriette, M.) |
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 01/03/2024. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 5
Prisoner E-Filing Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program Signed by Judge Janet C. Hall on 01/03/2024. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 4
STANDING PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 01/03/2024. (Peterson, M)
|
| Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 1/3/2024.(Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Brandon Anthony Ramos. (Imbriani, Susan) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Annear, Brysgel, Cauley, Cheney, Classon, Department of Corrections, Eason, Eliusseini, Gross, Hartenstein, Hollister, Johnson, Marshall, Perez, Scagliarini, Suol, Velez, Zezima, filed by Brandon Anthony Ramos.(Imbriani, Susan) |
| Judge Michael P Shea and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Reis, Julia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
