Hines v. Hines et al
| Marquese Hines |
| Telly Hines, Walter Wright and Shameka Hines |
| 3:2024cv00024 |
| January 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| Robert A Richardson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
Standing PROTECTIVE ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 1/8/2024.(Barry, L)
|
|
Filing 5
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 1/8/2024.(Barry, L)
|
|
Filing 4
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 3/8/2024 Discovery due by 7/9/2024 Dispositive Motions due by 8/13/2024 Signed by Clerk on 1/8/2024.(Barry, L)
|
| Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 1/8/2024. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marquese Hines. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Shameka Hines, Telly Hines, Walter Wright, filed by Marquese Hines. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Judge Victor A. Bolden and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Reis, Julia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
