Carmona v. Walmart Inc.
Alondra Carmona |
Walmart Inc. |
3:2024cv00053 |
January 17, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Robert N Chatigny |
Thomas O Farrish |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury |
Defendant |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 7, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 19 SCHEDULING ORDER: Please read full text of attached Order for details. Amended Pleadings due by 3/17/2024; Discovery due by 7/18/2024; Initial Status Report due by 4/7/2024; Prefiling Conference request Re: Dispositive motions due 6/3/2024; Settlement Conference 8/2024; Trial Ready Date 9/15/2024; Trial Brief due by 9/15/2024. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 3/7/2024. (Rickevicius, L.) |
Filing 18 REPORT of Rule 26(f) Planning Meeting. (Caines, Eric) |
Filing 17 ORDER: The court has reviewed the file in this case to monitor the parties' compliance with Local Rule 26(f). Local Rule 26(f) provides that, within 30 days after the appearance of any defendant, the attorneys of record and any unrepresented parties must confer for the purposes described in Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f). Local Rule 26(f) further provides that, within 14 days after the conference, the participants must jointly complete and file a report of the conference using Form 26(f). It appears that more than forty days have passed since the appearance of a defendant in this case, but no joint report has been filed. Accordingly, it is hereby ordered that the parties file their required report on or before March 12, 2024. So ordered. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 3/5/2024. (Rickevicius, L.) |
Set Deadlines: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 3/12/2024. (Rickevicius, L.) |
Filing 16 NOTICE by Walmart Inc. OF SERVICE OF COURT ORDERS IN REMOVED CASES (Springer, George) |
Filing 15 STANDING ORDER ON REMOVED CASES. Signed by Clerk on 1/17/2024. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 14 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #9 Notice of Appearance filed by Walmart Inc., #3 Notice (Other) filed by Walmart Inc., 10 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #12 Electronic Filing Order, #13 Standing Protective Order, #11 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #7 Disclosure Statement filed by Walmart Inc., #1 Notice of Removal filed by Walmart Inc., #4 Answer to Complaint filed by Walmart Inc., #8 Notice of Appearance filed by Walmart Inc., #5 Notice (Other) filed by Walmart Inc., #6 Notice (Other) filed by Walmart Inc., #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Walmart Inc. Signed by Clerk on 1/17/2024. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 13 Standing Protective Order. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 1/17/2024. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 12 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Robert N. Chatigny on 1/17/2024. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 11 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 3/17/2024. Discovery due by 7/18/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 8/22/2024. Signed by Clerk on 1/17/2024. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 10 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 1/17/2024.(Maturo, F.) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Depascale, Jr on behalf of Walmart Inc. (Depascale, Michael) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of Appearance by Eric B. Caines on behalf of Walmart Inc. (Caines, Eric) |
Filing 7 Disclosure Statement by Walmart Inc.. (Springer, George) |
Filing 6 NOTICE by Walmart Inc. STATEMENT REGARDING REMOVED CASE (Springer, George) |
Filing 5 NOTICE by Walmart Inc. OF PENDING MOTIONS (Springer, George) |
Filing 4 ANSWER to Complaint with Affirmative Defenses with Jury Demand by Walmart Inc..(Springer, George) |
Filing 3 NOTICE by Walmart Inc. CERTIFICATE OF FILING COPY OF NOTICE OF REMOVAL IN STATE COURT (Springer, George) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by George C. Springer, Jr on behalf of Walmart Inc. (Springer, George) |
Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL by Walmart Inc. from New Haven, case number NNH-CV24-6139296-S. Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ACTDC-7614563, filed by Walmart Inc..(Springer, George) |
Judge Robert N. Chatigny and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Carmona v. Walmart Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Alondra Carmona | |
Represented By: | Robert James Weber, III. |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Walmart Inc. | |
Represented By: | Eric B. Caines |
Represented By: | George C. Springer, Jr. |
Represented By: | Michael Depascale, Jr |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.