Crawley v. Inline Plastics Corp
Milton Crawley, III |
Inline Plastics Corp |
3:2024cv00068 |
January 19, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Victor A Bolden |
Robert A Richardson |
Personal Property: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Property Damage |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Inline Plastics Corp waiver sent on 1/31/2024, answer due 3/31/2024 filed by Milton Crawley, III. (Barber, Nicole) |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 11 CERTIFICATE OF GOOD STANDING re #9 MOTION for Attorney(s) Samuel J. Strauss to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7620864) by Milton Crawley, III. (Barber, Nicole) |
Filing 10 MOTION for Attorney(s) Raina C. Borrelli to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7620882) by Milton Crawley, III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Barber, Nicole) |
Filing 9 MOTION for Attorney(s) Samuel J. Strauss to be Admitted Pro Hac Vice (paid $200 PHV fee; receipt number ACTDC-7620864) by Milton Crawley, III. (Barber, Nicole) |
Filing 8 Disclosure Statement by Milton Crawley, III. (Barber, Nicole) |
Filing 7 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Inline Plastics Corp* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Nicole L. Barber* *Ventura Law* *235 Main Street* *Danbury, CT 06810*. (Imbriani, Susan) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Standing Protective Order, #1 Complaint filed by Milton Crawley, III, #4 Electronic Filing Order, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, Signed by Clerk on 1/19/2024.(Imbriani, Susan) |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 1/19/24.(Hushin, Z.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Inline Plastics Corp ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7619038.), filed by Milton Crawley, III. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A)(Barber, Nicole) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Inline Plastics Corp. (Barber, Nicole) |
Judge Victor A. Bolden and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Crawley v. Inline Plastics Corp | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Milton Crawley, III | |
Represented By: | Nicole L. Barber |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Inline Plastics Corp | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.