Owens v. City of Stamford et al
| Marvin E. Owens |
| City of Stamford, Brian Figueroa, Dinardo, Cordava, Hon. Daly, Moller and Daly |
| 3:2024cv00104 |
| January 24, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Thomas O Farrish |
| Vernon D Oliver |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 NOTICE OF INSUFFICIENCY. The plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; in other words, he seeks to commence a federal lawsuit without pre-paying the filing fee. A federal law, 28 U.S.C. 1915, permits him to do so if, among other things, he files an affidavit demonstrating that he is unable to pay the fee. To assist inmate plaintiffs in making this demonstration, the District of Connecticut provides them with a six-page form to be filled out.The Court previously called to the Plaintiffs attention that he had filled out the wrong form. He has now attempted to fill out the right one, but not all of the pages reached the Clerk of the Court. As received by the Clerk, Plaintiffs application does not include pages two, four, or six of the standard application. With half of the form missing, the Court cannot determine whether he is able to pay. Moreover, the Plaintiff must complete and sign the authorization on page four.The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to mail the plaintiff another copy of the application form at his address of record. The plaintiff is directed to complete all pages of the form and return it to the Clerk of the Court by April 12, 2024. If he does not do so, his case may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 3/22/2024.(Corriette, M.) |
| Filing 14 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Marvin E. Owens. (Gaskins, A) |
| Filing 13 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marvin E. Owens. (Gaskins, A) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE OF INSUFFICIENCY. The plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis; in other words, he seeks to commence a federal lawsuit without prepaying the filing fee. A federal law, 28 U.S.C. 1915, permits him to do so if, among other things, he submits a financial affidavit showing that he is unable to pay. As an incarcerated person, he is also required by 28 U.S.C. 1915 to submit a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the six month period preceding his complaint. To assist inmates in demonstrating inability to pay, the District of Connecticut has prepared a standard-form in forma pauperis application.In this case, the plaintiff submitted the wrong in forma pauperis application form. He also did not submit a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement. His application is therefore insufficient. The Clerk of the Court is respectfully directed to send the plaintiff a blank copy of the correct application form at his address of record. The plaintiff is directed to fill out the form completely and accurately, and to file it with the Clerk of the Court along with a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement covering at least the period from August 22, 2023 to January 22, 2024. If he fails to do so by March 25, 2024, his case may be dismissed. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 3/4/2024.(Corriette, M.) |
| Filing 11 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Marvin E. Owens. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Ferguson, L.) |
| Filing 10 The Clerk is respectfully directed to update Plaintiff's address on the docket and mail copies of the filings on this docket to Plaintiff at his new address. The deadline for Plaintiff to file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis is extended to March 4, 2024. Signed by Judge Vernon D. Oliver on 2/27/2024.(Rogers, D) |
| Filing 9 Letter from Marvin E. Owens Dated 2/16/2024 Re: Enclosed Motions (Gaskins, A) |
| Filing 8 MOTION for copy(s), MOTION for Extension of Time by Marvin E. Owens. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(Gaskins, A) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (Gaskins, A) |
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Vernon D. Oliver on 1/24/2024.(Gaskins, A)
|
|
Filing 5
Prisoner E-Filing Standing Order on Prisoner Electronic Filing Program Signed by Chief Judge on 06/22/2016.(Gaskins, A)
|
|
Filing 4
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Vernon D. Oliver on 1/24/2024.(Gaskins, A)
|
| Filing 3 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 1/24/2024. (Peterson, M) |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: We received your Complaint which has been assigned case number 3:23-cv-104. In order to proceed, the filing fee or a Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis must be submitted to the Court by 2/23/2024 or the case will be subject to dismissal. Fee information and the Motion for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis form may be found on the Court's website at ctd.uscourts.gov. Dismissal due by 2/23/2024. Signed by Clerk on 1/24/2024. (Peterson, M)
|
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against City of Stamford, Cordava, Daly, Dinardo, Brian Figueroa, Moller, filed by Marvin E. Owens. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Peterson, M) |
| Judge Vernon D. Oliver and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Reis, Julia) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
