Kamel v. Five Churches Brewing LLC et al
AYMAN KAMEL |
Five Churches Brewing LLC, Five Churches BTB, Peter Lemnotis, Philip Lemnotis, Five Churches Brewing LLC doing business as Five Churches Brewing and Five Churches by the Bay LLC doing business as Five Churches by the Bay |
3:2024cv00112 |
January 29, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Michael P Shea |
Robert M Spector |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Peter Lemnotis waiver sent on 2/12/2024, answer due 4/12/2024; Five Churches by the Bay LLC waiver sent on 2/12/2024, answer due 4/12/2024; Five Churches Brewing LLC waiver sent on 2/12/2024, answer due 4/12/2024; Philip Lemnotis waiver sent on 2/12/2024, answer due 4/12/2024 filed by Ayman Kamel. (Bradley, William) |
Filing 11 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Five Churches Brewing LLC, Five Churches by the Bay LLC, Peter Lemnotis, Philip Lemnotis* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *William E Bradley* *Robinson & Cole LLP* *1201 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Suite 820* *Washington, DC 20004*. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #6 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint, filed by Ayman Kamel, 4 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #8 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, #5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #9 Report on Patent/Trademark Form, #2 Notice of Appearance filed by Ayman Kamel, #7 Standing Protective Order, #3 Disclosure Statement filed by Ayman Kamel Signed by Clerk on 2/1/2024. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 9 AO 120 Report on the Filing of an Action re: Patent or Trademark Form Completed (Attachments: #1 Complaint) (Peterson, M) |
Filing 8 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 7 Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 01/30/2024. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 6 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 01/30/2024. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 3/30/2024. Discovery due by 7/31/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 9/4/2024. Signed by Clerk on 01/30/2024. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 4 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 1/30/24.(Hushin, Z.) |
Filing 3 Disclosure Statement by AYMAN KAMEL. (Bradley, William) |
Filing 2 NOTICE of Appearance by William E Bradley on behalf of AYMAN KAMEL (Bradley, William) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7630459.), filed by AYMAN KAMEL. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C, #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Civil Action Cover Sheet)(Bradley, William) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to All Defendants. (Bradley, William) |
Judge Michael P Shea and Judge Robert M. Spector added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.