Hollis v. Ahold USA, Inc et al
| Ann Hollis |
| Ahold USA, Inc, Ahold Delhaize USA, Inc, Retail Business Services LLC and Stop & Shop Supermarket Company, LLC |
| 3:2024cv00138 |
| February 2, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Maria E Garcia |
| Sarala V Nagala |
| Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
| 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 15, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 15 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Stop & Shop Supermarket Company, LLC waiver sent on 2/8/2024, answer due 4/8/2024 filed by Ann Hollis. (West, Catherine) |
| Filing 14 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Retail Business Services LLC waiver sent on 2/8/2024, answer due 4/8/2024 filed by Ann Hollis. (West, Catherine) |
| Filing 13 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Ahold USA, Inc waiver sent on 2/8/2024, answer due 4/8/2024 filed by Ann Hollis. (West, Catherine) |
| Filing 12 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to Ahold Delhaize USA, Inc waiver sent on 2/8/2024, answer due 4/8/2024 filed by Ann Hollis. (West, Catherine) |
| Filing 11 Initial Discovery Protocols for Employment Cases Alleging Adverse Action. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 2/14/2024.(Bozek, Michael) |
| Filing 10 NOTICE of Appearance by Michael Varraso on behalf of Ann Hollis (Varraso, Michael) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Benjamin Jacob Wyatt on behalf of Ann Hollis (Wyatt, Benjamin) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES: Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #7 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, #1 Complaint, filed by Ann Hollis, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #5 Standing Protective Order, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #6 Notice. Signed by Clerk on 2/5/2024. (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 7 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (Mendez, D) |
| Filing 6 Notice re Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Clerk on 2/2/2024. (Attachments: #1 Initial Discovery Attachment) (Mendez, D) |
Filing 5
Standing Protective Order. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 2/2/2024. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER. Signed by Judge Sarala V. Nagala on 2/2/2024. (Mendez, D)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 4/2/2024. Discovery due by 8/3/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 9/7/2024. Signed by Clerk on 2/2/2024. (Mendez, D)
|
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 2/2/24.(Hushin, Z.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Hollis against Ahold Delhaize USA, Inc, Ahold USA, Inc, Retail Business Services LLC, Stop & Shop Supermarket Company LC ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7636066.), filed by Ann Hollis. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Civil Cover Sheet)(West, Catherine) Modified on 2/2/2024 to correct party (Hushin, Z.). |
| Judge Sarala V. Nagala and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
