DeRose v. Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff: Edrice DeRose
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2024cv00153
Filed: February 6, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Maria E Garcia
Referring Judge: Robert A Richardson
2 Judge: Michael P Shea
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of SSA Decision SSID - SSI Disability Cases
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 The Government having filed the administrative record on 4/4/2024 the Court hereby enters the following Scheduling Order:Plaintiff shall file a motion to reverse and/or remand and supporting memorandum of law no later than 5/6/2024. Defendant shall then have 30 days from filing of Plaintiff's motion to file a motion to affirm or a motion for voluntary remand. Within 14 days after Defendant files its motion, Plaintiff may file a reply pursuant to Local Rule 7(d).Prior to the filing of any dispositive motions, the parties are encouraged to confer regarding the merits of the case in an effort to determine whether a reversal and voluntary remand are appropriate. The Court reminds the parties of the previously filed Standing Order which sets forth page limits and form and content requirements for motions and supporting memoranda. In addition to complying with these requirements, memoranda should avoid boilerplate discussions of the governing legal standards as the Court is familiar with the standard of review and the sequential evaluation process employed in the analysis of Social Security disability applications. The parties should focus on informing the Court of relevant and controlling legal authority and applying it to the facts of this case. Motions filed by the parties must comply with the requirements set forth above, in the Standing Order, and in the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to comply may result in denial of the motion. Any motion for extension of a deadline must comply with the Social Security Standing Order and Local Rule 7(b)(2) and must be filed at least three (3) days before the existing deadline. Signed by Judge Robert A. Richardson on 4/5/2024.(Fries, J.)
April 4, 2024 Filing 13 Social Security Transcripts. (Molinaro, John)
February 16, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Robert A. Richardson on 2/15/24.(Blue, A.)
February 15, 2024 Filing 11 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Commissioner of Social Security, Edrice DeRose. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 2/15/2024.(Maturo, F.)
February 12, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER granting #2 Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis.Plaintiff has filed a motion seeking to proceed without payment of fees and costs, along with a financial affidavit. Plaintiff has fully completed the required information. Plaintiff asserts that Plaintiff is unable to afford to pay fees and costs. At this stage, such allegations are sufficient to establish that Plaintiff is unable to pay the ordinary filing fees required by the Court. 28 U.S.C. 1915(a)(1). Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. The Court has also reviewed the Complaint (ECF No. 1) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) and finds the claim is sufficient to proceed to service of process on the defendant.Signed by Judge Maria E. Garcia on 2/12/2024. (Cabral, Donald)
February 7, 2024 Filing 9 Notice of New SSA Action: Electronic service of the complaint was made by the Clerk's Office upon the Social Security Office of General Counsel and the US Attorney's Office for the District of Connecticut. (Chartier, A.)
February 7, 2024 Filing 4 NOTICE of Appearance by John Molinaro on behalf of Commissioner of Social Security (Molinaro, John)
February 6, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE to Counsel: Due to privacy restrictions on social security cases, absent both a consent to electronic notice and an approved motion for efiling privileges, counsel must mail paper copies to self-represented litigants. Signed by Clerk on 2/6/2024.(Chartier, A.)
February 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 2/6/2024.(Chartier, A.)
February 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 Standing ORDER Re: Social Security Cases. Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 2/6/2024.(Chartier, A.)
February 6, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Standing ORDER on Social Security Appeals. Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 2/6/2024. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Chartier, A.)
February 6, 2024 Answer deadline updated for Commissioner of Social Security to 4/6/2024. (Chartier, A.)
February 6, 2024 Filing 3 NOTICE by Edrice DeRose of consent to magistrate jurisdiction (Huebner, Gary)
February 6, 2024 Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis with supporting financial affidavit by Edrice DeRose. (Huebner, Gary)
February 6, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants, filed by Edrice DeRose. (Attachments: #1 Supplement notice of appeals council action)(Huebner, Gary)
February 6, 2024 Judge Michael P Shea and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Freberg, B)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: DeRose v. Commissioner of Social Security
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Edrice DeRose
Represented By: Gary W. Huebner
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security
Represented By: John Molinaro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?