Nelson v. Eversource Energy Service Company et al
| Gregory Nelson |
| Eversource Energy Service Company and RMC Technologies, Inc |
| 3:2024cv00176 |
| February 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Jeffrey A Meyer |
| Robert M Spector |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1981 Job Discrimination (Race) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 INITIAL DISCOVERY PROTOCOLS Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 2/22/2024.(Lewis, D) |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *RMC Technologies, Inc * with answer to complaint due within *21* days. *Gregory Nelson* *931 W. Arquilla Drive* *Gregory Nelson 931 W. Arquilla Drive Aptartment 431* *Glenwood, IL 60425*. (Chartier, A.) |
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Eversource Energy Service Company* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. *Gregory Nelson* *931 W. Arquilla Drive* *Aptartment 431* *Glenwood, IL 60425*. (Chartier, A.) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE REGARDING SERVICE: The self-represented plaintiff shall proceed with service upon the defendant(s) pursuant to Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and may refer to pages 8-11 of the Court's Guide for Self-Represented Parties found on our website here: https://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/rules-and-forms. If service is not effected by 5/9/2024, the case will be subject to dismissal. Dismissal due by 5/9/2024. Signed by Clerk on 2/9/2024.(Chartier, A.) |
| Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Gregory Nelson, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #7 Notice, #5 Standing Protective Order, #6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #4 Electronic Filing Order Signed by Clerk on 2/9/2024.(Chartier, A.) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Eversource Energy Service Company, RMC Technologies, Inc. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE re Initial Discovery Protocols. Signed by Clerk on 2/8/2024. (Attachments: #1 Attachment)(Chartier, A.) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (Chartier, A.) |
Filing 5
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 2/8/2024.(Chartier, A.)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer on 2/8/2024.(Chartier, A.)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 4/8/2024 Discovery due by 8/9/2024 Dispositive Motions due by 9/13/2024 Signed by Clerk on 2/8/2024.(Chartier, A.)
|
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 2/8/2024.(Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Eversource Energy Service Company, RMC Technologies, Inc, filed by Gregory Nelson. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Filing fee received from Gregory Nelson: $405.00, receipt number BPT-14154. (Fanelle, N.) |
| Judge Jeffrey A. Meyer and Judge Robert M. Spector added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
