Frischling v. Radford et al
Steven Frischling |
David Radford, II, Albert Gosselin, III and Town of Montville |
3:2024cv00198 |
February 13, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Robert A Richardson |
Michael P Shea |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Set Deadlines: Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 5/10/2024 (Johnson, D.) |
Filing 26 ORDER: The #25 consented-to motion for an extension of time until May 10, 2024 to file the Rule 26f report is granted. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 4/5/24. (Constantine, A.) |
Filing 25 First MOTION for Extension of Time until May 10, 2024 (with consent of all Defendants) for Filing Joint Report of Parties' Planning Conference under Rule 26(f) by Steven Frischling. (Carnelli, Dennis) |
Filing 24 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed as to David Radford, II waiver sent on 2/15/2024, answer due 5/15/2024 filed by Steven Frischling. (Carnelli, Dennis) |
Filing 23 ORDER: The consented-to motions for extension of time until May 15, 2024 in which to file a response to the complaint (ECF Nos. #20 , #22 ) are granted. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/28/24. (Constantine, A.) |
Answer deadline updated for Albert Gosselin, III to 5/15/2024; Town of Montville to 5/15/2024. (Johnson, D.) |
Filing 22 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until May 15, 2024 to file a response to the plaintiff's Complaint by Albert Gosselin, III. (Medeiros, Janelle) |
Answer deadline updated for David Radford, II to 5/15/2024. (Johnson, D.) |
Filing 21 ORDER: Defendant Radford's consented-to motion (ECF No. #19 ) for an extension of time until May 15, 2024 in which to file a response to the complaint is granted. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/26/24. (Constantine, A.) |
Filing 20 Consent MOTION for Extension of Time until May 15, 2024 plead #1 Complaint by Town of Montville. (Williams, James) |
Filing 19 MOTION for Extension of Time until May 15, 2024 to file a response to plaintiff's complaint by David Radford, II. (Gerarde, Thomas) |
Filing 18 NOTICE of Appearance by James G. Williams on behalf of Town of Montville (Williams, James) |
Filing 17 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas R. Gerarde on behalf of David Radford, II (Amended with E-Signature) (Gerarde, Thomas) |
Filing 16 NOTICE of Appearance by Thomas R. Gerarde on behalf of David Radford, II (Gerarde, Thomas) |
Filing 15 NOTICE of Appearance by James G. Williams on behalf of David Radford, II, Town of Montville (Williams, James) |
Answer deadline updated for Albert Gosselin, III to 4/20/2024; David Radford, II to 4/20/2024; Town of Montville to 4/20/2024. (Johnson, D.) |
Filing 14 ORDER: Defendants' consented-to motion for an extension of time until April 20, 2024 in which to respond to the Complaint (ECF No. #13 ) is granted. Signed by Judge Michael P. Shea on 3/7/24. (Constantine, A.) |
Filing 13 First MOTION for Extension of Time until 04/20/2024to respond to Complaint by Albert Gosselin, III, David Radford, II, Town of Montville. (Bouchard, Timothy) |
Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance by Timothy Bouchard on behalf of Albert Gosselin, III, David Radford, II, Town of Montville (Bouchard, Timothy) |
Filing 11 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Steven Frischling. Town of Montville served on 2/21/2024, answer due 3/13/2024. (Carnelli, Dennis) |
Filing 10 WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed filed by Albert Gosselin, III. (Medeiros, Janelle) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Appearance by Janelle Medeiros on behalf of Albert Gosselin, III (Medeiros, Janelle) |
Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Town of Montville* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Dennis Mark Carnelli* *Neubert, Pepe & Monteith, P.C.* *195 Church Street, 13th Floor* *New Haven, CT 06510*. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Steven Frischling, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Standing Protective Order, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Signed by Clerk on 02/14/2024. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 5 Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 02/13/2024. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 02/13/2024. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 4/13/2024. Discovery due by 8/14/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 9/18/2024. Signed by Clerk on 02/13/2024. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 2/13/24.(Hushin, Z.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7647017.), filed by Steven Frischling.(Carnelli, Dennis) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Town of Montville. (Carnelli, Dennis) |
Judge Michael P Shea and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.