Jackson et al v. City of New Haven et al
| Karen Jackson and E.F. |
| City of New Haven, City of New Haven Police Department, City of Waterbury, City of Waterbury Police Department, State of Connecticut State Police, State of Connecticut and 50 Unknown Officers |
| 3:2024cv00237 |
| February 21, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Michael P Shea |
| Robert M Spector |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 USM 285 forms together with Summons and all instructions mailed to IFP plaintiff to complete and return to Clerk's office. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #7 Standing Protective Order, #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Karen Jackson, #5 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #8 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction, #6 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint, filed by Karen Jackson, E.F., #3 Appearance Self Represented Party filed by Karen Jackson, 4 Notice re: Disclosure Statement Signed by Clerk on 4/9/2024. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 11 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *50 Unknown Officers, City of New Haven, City of New Haven Police Department, City of Waterbury, City of Waterbury Police Department, State of Connecticut, State of Connecticut State Police* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. *Karen Jackson* *19 Ludlow Street* *Waterbury, CT 06710*. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 10
ORDER. The #2 motion to proceed in forma pauperis is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 3/19/2024. (Bassali, D)
|
| Filing 9 EXHIBIT re #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Karen Jackson. (Peterson, M) |
| Filing 8 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (Peterson, M) |
|
Filing 7
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 02/21/2024. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 02/21/2024. (Peterson, M)
|
|
Filing 5
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 4/21/2024. Discovery due by 8/22/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 9/26/2024. Signed by Clerk on 02/21/2024. (Peterson, M)
|
| Judge Michael P Shea and Judge Robert M. Spector added. (Freberg, B) |
| Filing 4 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 2/21/2024.(Chartier, A.) |
| Filing 3 Appearance Self Represented Party by Karen Jackson (Chartier, A.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Karen Jackson. (Chartier, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 50 Unknown Officers, City of New Haven, City of New Haven Police Department, City of Waterbury, City of Waterbury Police Department, State of Connecticut, State of Connecticut State Police filed by E.F., Karen Jackson.(Chartier, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
