O'Meara v. Town of Ridgefield
Carol O'Meara |
Town of Ridgefield |
3:2024cv00250 |
February 25, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Maria E Garcia |
Michael P Shea |
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment |
42 U.S.C. ยง 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 26, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Town of Ridgefield* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Michael C. McMinn* *The McMinn Employment Law Firm, LLC* *1000 Lafayette Blvd., Suite 1100* *Bridgeport, CT 06604*. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #1 Complaint filed by Carol O'Meara, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #7 Notice, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #5 Standing Protective Order, #4 Electronic Filing Order, #6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Signed by Clerk on 2/26/2024. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 7 Notice re Initial Discovery Protocols Signed by Clerk on 02/25/2024. (Attachments: #1 Initial Discovery Protocols Attachment) (Peterson, M) |
Filing 6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 5 Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 02/25/2024. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 02/25/2024. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 4/25/2024. Discovery due by 8/26/2024. Dispositive Motions due by 9/30/2024. Signed by Clerk on 02/25/2024. (Peterson, M) |
Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 2/25/2024.(Perez, J.) |
Judge Michael P Shea and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Oliver, T.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Town of Ridgefield ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7660055.), filed by Carol OMeara. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Civil Cover Sheet)(McMinn, Michael) |
Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Town of Ridgefield. (McMinn, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: O'Meara v. Town of Ridgefield | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Carol O'Meara | |
Represented By: | Michael C. McMinn |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Town of Ridgefield | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.