Tanner v. Experian Information Solutions, Inc et al
| Tristan Tanner |
| Experian Information Solutions, Inc, Equifax Information Services LLC and National Credit Systems, Inc. |
| 3:2024cv00273 |
| February 29, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Victor A Bolden |
| S Dave Vatti |
| Consumer Credit |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *National Credit Systems, Inc.* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Sarah Poriss* *Sarah Poriss Attorney at Law, LLC* *645 Farmington Ave., 3rd Fl.* *Hartford, CT 06105*. (Imbriani, S) |
| Filing 9 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Experian Information Solutions, Inc* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Sarah Poriss* *Sarah Poriss Attorney at Law, LLC* *645 Farmington Ave., 3rd Fl.* *Hartford, CT 06105*. (Imbriani, S) |
| Filing 8 ELECTRONIC SUMMONS ISSUED in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 4 and LR 4 as to *Equifax Information Services LLC* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Sarah Poriss* *Sarah Poriss Attorney at Law, LLC* *645 Farmington Ave., 3rd Fl.* *Hartford, CT 06105*. (Imbriani, S) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO COUNSEL/SELF-REPRESENTED PARTIES : Counsel or self-represented parties initiating or removing this action are responsible for serving all parties with attached documents and copies of #4 Electronic Filing Order, #1 Complaint, filed by Tristan Tanner, #5 Standing Protective Order, 2 Notice re: Disclosure Statement, #3 Order on Pretrial Deadlines, #6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction Signed by Clerk on 2/29/2024.(Imbriani, S) |
| Filing 6 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (Imbriani, S) |
Filing 5
Standing Protective Order Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 2/29/2024.(Imbriani, S)
|
|
Filing 4
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Victor A. Bolden on 2/29/2024.(Imbriani, S)
|
|
Filing 3
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 4/29/2024, Discovery due by 8/30/2024, Dispositive Motions due by 10/4/2024. Signed by Clerk on 2/29/2024.(Imbriani, S)
|
| Filing 2 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 2/29/2024.(Maturo, F.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Experian Information Solutions, Inc., Equifax Information Services LLC., and National Credit Systems, Inc. ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7665428.), filed by Tristan Tanner.(Poriss, Sarah) Modified on 2/29/2024 to correct docket text per phone call from the Plaintiff. (Samson, J). |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Experian Information Solutions, Inc. (Poriss, Sarah) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Equifax Information Services LLC. (Poriss, Sarah) |
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to National Credit Systems, Inc.. (Poriss, Sarah) |
| Judge Victor A. Bolden and Judge S. Dave Vatti added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
