Colon v. City of New Haven et al
| Jaylene Colon |
| City of New Haven, City of New Haven Police Department, City of Waterbury, City of Waterbury Police Department, City of New Haven Major Crimes Unit, 50 Unknown Officers, State of Connecticut and State of Connecticut State Police |
| 3:2024cv00300 |
| March 5, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Kari A Dooley |
| Robert A Richardson |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER DISMISSING CASE. By Order dated March 11, 2024, Plaintiff was advised that if he intended to prosecute his claims he must file a fully executed motion to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the filing fee by March 25, 2024. See ECF No. 10. He has not done so. Accordingly, it is ordered that this matter is dismissed without prejudice. The Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 4/1/2024.(Gould, K.)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER #2 Plaintiff's Motion for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is denied without prejudice to refiling by 3/25/2024. Plaintiff has failed to fully fill out the in forma pauperis financial affidavit. Without full and accurate financial information the court is unable to determine if the plaintiff is eligible to proceed in forma pauperis. For instance, plaintiff has listed a current employer but has not indicated a gross weekly income. Additionally, plaintiff has listed all monthly financial obligations as zero. If plaintiff wishes to refile the motion, they are instructed to fully complete the financial affidavit and refile by 3/25/2024. In the alternative, plaintiff may pay the required filing fee. Signed by Judge Robert A. Richardson on 3/11/2024. (Fries, J.)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson for ruling on #2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis and review of the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 3/8/2024. Motion referred to Magistrate Judge Robert A. Richardson.(Gould, K.)
|
| Filing 8 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (Fanelle, N.) |
|
Filing 7
Standing Protective Order. Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 3/5/2024. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 6
ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Kari A. Dooley on 3/5/2024. (Fanelle, N.)
|
|
Filing 5
Order on Pretrial Deadlines: Amended Pleadings due by 5/4/2024 Discovery due by 9/4/2024 Dispositive Motions due by 10/9/2024 Signed by Clerk on 3/5/2024. (Fanelle, N.)
|
| Filing 4 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 3/5/2024.(Chartier, A.) |
| Filing 3 MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Jaylene Colon. (Chartier, A.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Jaylene Colon. (Chartier, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against 50 Unknown Officers, City of New Haven, City of New Haven Major Crimes Unit, City of New Haven Police Department, City of Waterbury, City of Waterbury Police Department, State of Connecticut, State of Connecticut State Police, filed by Jaylene Colon.(Chartier, A.) |
| Judge Kari A. Dooley and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Freberg, B) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
