Osorio v. O'Malley

Plaintiff: Adal Michael Osorio
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Interested Party: Social Security Administration
Case Number: 3:2024cv00315
Filed: March 8, 2024
Court: US District Court for the District of Connecticut
Presiding Judge: Thomas O Farrish
Referring Judge: Maria E Garcia
2 Judge: Michael P Shea
Nature of Suit: Social Security: SSID Tit. XVI
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of SSA Decision SSID - SSI Disability Cases
Jury Demanded By: None
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 3, 2024 Filing 11 SCHEDULING ORDER: The Government having filed the administrative record on May 2, 2024, the Court hereby enters the following Scheduling Order:* Plaintiff shall file a motion to reverse and/or remand and supporting memorandum of law no later than June 3, 2024.* Defendant shall then have until July 3, 2024, to file a motion to affirm or a motion for voluntary remand.* Within 14 days after Defendant files its motion, Plaintiff may file a reply pursuant to Local Rule 7(d).Prior to the filing of any dispositive motions, the parties are encouraged to confer regarding the merits of the case in an effort to determine whether a reversal and voluntary remand are appropriate. The Court reminds the parties of the previously filed Standing Order which sets forth page limits and form and content requirements for motions and supporting memoranda. In addition to complying with these requirements, memoranda should avoid boilerplate discussions of the governing legal standards as the Court is familiar with the standard of review and the sequential evaluation process employed in the analysis of Social Security disability applications. The parties should focus on informing the Court of relevant and controlling legal authority and applying it to the facts of this case.Motions filed by the parties must comply with the requirements set forth above, in the Standing Order, and in the Local Rules of Civil Procedure. Failure to comply may result in denial of the motion. Any motion for extension of a deadline must comply with the Social Security Standing Order and Local Rule 7(b)(2) and must be filed at least three (3) days before the existing deadline. It is so ordered. Signed by Judge Thomas O. Farrish on 5/3/24.(Wood, R.)
May 2, 2024 Filing 10 Social Security Transcripts. (Attachments: #1 Supplement Part Two, #2 Supplement Part Three, #3 Supplement Part Four, #4 Supplement Part Five, #5 Supplement Part Six, #6 Supplement Part Seven, #7 Supplement Part Eight, #8 Supplement Part Nine, #9 Supplement Part Ten)(Molinaro, John)
March 13, 2024 Filing 9 CONSENT to Jurisdiction by US Magistrate Judge by Martin O'Malley, Adal Michael Osorio. Case reassigned to Magistrate Judge Thomas O. Farrish. This matter has been transferred to a magistrate judge. All non-efiled submissions should be filed at the seat of court where the magistrate judge presides. The case number will remain the same, but must be followed by the magistrate judge's initials. Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 3/13/2024.(Maturo, F.)
March 11, 2024 Filing 8 NOTICE by Adal Michael Osorio Notice, Consent & Reference of a Civil Action to a Magistrate Judge (Ciccarillo, Dennis)
March 11, 2024 Filing 7 NOTICE of Appearance by John Molinaro on behalf of Martin O'Malley (Molinaro, John)
March 8, 2024 Filing 6 Notice of New SSA Action: Electronic service of the complaint was made by the Clerk's Office upon the Social Security Office of General Counsel and the US Attorney's Office for the District of Connecticut. (Chartier, A.)
March 8, 2024 Filing 5 NOTICE to Counsel: Due to privacy restrictions on social security cases, absent both a consent to electronic notice and an approved motion for efiling privileges, counsel must mail paper copies to self-represented litigants. Signed by Clerk on 3/8/2024.(Chartier, A.)
March 8, 2024 Filing 4 ELECTRONIC FILING ORDER FOR COUNSEL - PLEASE ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH COURTESY COPY REQUIREMENTS IN THIS ORDER Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 3/8/2024.(Chartier, A.)
March 8, 2024 Filing 3 Standing ORDER Re: Social Security Cases. Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 3/8/2024.(Chartier, A.)
March 8, 2024 Filing 2 Standing ORDER on Social Security Appeals. Signed by Judge Michael P Shea on 3/8/2024. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form)(Chartier, A.)
March 8, 2024 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Martin O'Malley ( Filing fee $405 receipt number ACTDC-7675977.), filed by Adal Michael Osorio.(Ciccarillo, Dennis)
March 8, 2024 Answer deadline updated for Martin O'Malley to 5/8/2024. (Chartier, A.)
March 8, 2024 Judge Michael P Shea and Judge Maria E. Garcia added. (Freberg, B)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Osorio v. O'Malley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adal Michael Osorio
Represented By: Dennis G. Ciccarillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Martin O'Malley
Represented By: John Molinaro.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Interested party: Social Security Administration
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?