Hatley v. Stover
Stephanie Ann Hatley |
R. Stover |
3:2024cv00331 |
March 11, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Thomas O Farrish |
Sarala V Nagala |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 24, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 12 JUDGMENT entered in favor of the Respondent.For Appeal Forms please go to the following website: http://www.ctd.uscourts.gov/forms/all-forms/appeals_forms Signed by Clerk on 4/24/2024.(Bozek, M) |
JUDICIAL PROCEEDINGS SURVEY - FOR COUNSEL ONLY: The following link to the confidential survey requires you to log into CM/ECF for SECURITY purposes. Once in CM/ECF you will be prompted for the case number. Although you are receiving this survey through CM/ECF, it is hosted on an independent website called SurveyMonkey. Once in SurveyMonkey, the survey is located in a secure account. The survey is not docketed and it is not sent directly to the judge. To ensure anonymity, completed surveys are held up to 90 days before they are sent to the judge for review. We hope you will take this opportunity to participate, please click on this link: https://ecf.ctd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/Dispatch.pl?survey (Bozek, M) |
|
Filing 10 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement, by Stephanie Ann Hatley. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 9 MOTION to Appoint Counsel, by Stephanie Ann Hatley. (Attachments: #1 Envelope) (Mendez, D) |
Filing 8 Petitioners Response to Respondents Response to Show Cause Order, by Stephanie Ann Hatley, filed by Stephanie Ann Hatley. (Mendez, D) |
Filing 7 RESPONSE TO 2 Order to Show Cause,,, by R. Stover filed by R. Stover. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - Judgment in a Criminal Case, #2 Exhibit B - Reinstated Judgment in a Criminal Case, #3 Exhibit C - Circuit Mandate, #4 Exhibit D - Denial of Motion for Sentence Reduction, #5 Exhibit E - Sentencing Comp, #6 Exhibit F - March 2024 FSA Assessment Sheet)(McConaghy, Michelle) |
Filing 6 NOTICE of Appearance by Michelle Lynn McConaghy on behalf of R. Stover (McConaghy, Michelle) |
Set Deadline: Show Cause Response due by 4/1/2024. (Bozek, M) |
|
Filing 5 Notice of Option to Consent to Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. (Mendez, D) |
|
|
Filing 1 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus, filed by Stephanie Ann Hatley.(Imbriani, S) (Additional attachment(s) added on 3/13/2024: #1 envelope) (Imbriani, S). |
Filing fee received from Stephanie Hatley: $ 5.00, receipt number BPT-14203. (Imbriani, S) |
Judge Sarala V. Nagala and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Hatley v. Stover | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner: Stephanie Ann Hatley | |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: R. Stover | |
Represented By: | Michelle Lynn McConaghy |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.