Andrews v. Quiros et al
| Robert D. Andrews, II |
| Angel Quiros, Jesus Guadarramma and Robert Martin |
| 3:2024cv00424 |
| March 22, 2024 |
| US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
| Sarala V Nagala |
| Robert A Richardson |
| Prisoner Petitions - Prison Conditions |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Request for Clerk to issue summons as to Jesus Guadarramma, Robert Martin, Angel Quiros. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 5 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 3/22/2024. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 4 Prisoner Authorization Form by Robert D. Andrews, II. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Robert D. Andrews, II. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Robert D. Andrews, II. (Oliver, T.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jesus Guadarramma, Robert Martin, Angel Quiros, filed by Robert D. Andrews, II. (Oliver, T.) |
| Judge Sarala V. Nagala and Judge Robert A. Richardson added. (Oliver, T.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
