Cook v. Mastroianni et al
Andrew Cook |
James Mastroianni, Scott Meikle, Ryan Froehlich, Jane Doe and John Doe |
3:2024cv00426 |
March 25, 2024 |
US District Court for the District of Connecticut |
Thomas O Farrish |
Omar A Williams |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 Notice: Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 7.1, a disclosure statement must be filed with a party's first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the Court and must be supplemented if any required information changes during the case. Signed by Clerk on 3/25/2024. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 3 Prisoner Trust Fund Account Statement by Andrew Cook. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 2 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis by Andrew Cook. (Fanelle, N.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Jane Doe(#2, Officer, in their official and individual capacity ), Jane Doe, Jane Doe(#1, Officer, in their official and individual capacity ), John Doe(#1, Officer, in their official and individual capacity ), John Doe(#2, Officer, in their official and individual capacity ), John Doe(#3, Officer, in their official and individual capacity ), Ryan Froehlich, James Mastroianni, Scott Meikle, filed by Andrew Cook. (Fanelle, N.) |
Judge Omar A. Williams and Judge Thomas O. Farrish added. (Reis, J) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Connecticut District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.